International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 2009
The development of an Incontinence Treatment Motivation Questionnaire for patients undergoing pelvic floor physiotherapy in the treatment of stress incontinence.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sarma Susmita, Hawthorne Graeme, Thakkar Kiran, Hayes Wendy, Moore Kate H
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this paper is to develop a motivation questionnaire regarding perseverance in pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) supervised by physiotherapists for stress urinary incontinence.
METHODS: Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted in women with stress urinary incontinence that revealed 15 common themes; 117 items were constructed and reviewed by continence advisors. Surviving items (n = 73) were administered to 210 women. Data were analysed for item properties, factor analysis was used to examine the questionnaire structure and tests of convergence/divergence used to check for sensitivity.
RESULTS: The Incontinence Treatment Motivation Questionnaire (ITMQ) comprises 18-items in five scales, assessing attitudes towards treatment (72.62% of explained variance; alpha = 0.87), reasons for not doing PFMT (55.73%; alpha = 0.74), living with incontinence (62.70% variance; alpha = 0.70), desire for treatment (65.37% variance; alpha = 0.74) and the effect of incontinence severity on PFMT (51.62% variance, alpha = 0.68). Scales were generally sensitive to known group differences.
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first effort to develop a motivation scale for PFMT. This validated Motivation Questionnaire is an instrument to test the impact of motivation upon cure, in PFMT.
METHODS: Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted in women with stress urinary incontinence that revealed 15 common themes; 117 items were constructed and reviewed by continence advisors. Surviving items (n = 73) were administered to 210 women. Data were analysed for item properties, factor analysis was used to examine the questionnaire structure and tests of convergence/divergence used to check for sensitivity.
RESULTS: The Incontinence Treatment Motivation Questionnaire (ITMQ) comprises 18-items in five scales, assessing attitudes towards treatment (72.62% of explained variance; alpha = 0.87), reasons for not doing PFMT (55.73%; alpha = 0.74), living with incontinence (62.70% variance; alpha = 0.70), desire for treatment (65.37% variance; alpha = 0.74) and the effect of incontinence severity on PFMT (51.62% variance, alpha = 0.68). Scales were generally sensitive to known group differences.
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first effort to develop a motivation scale for PFMT. This validated Motivation Questionnaire is an instrument to test the impact of motivation upon cure, in PFMT.