Cirugia espanola · 2009
[Results of national survey of specialists on the clinical evaluation of faecal incontinence].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Parés David, Pera Miguel, Cartanyà Anna, Delgado-Aros Silvia, De Miguel Mario, Ortiz Hector, Grande Luis
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Faecal incontinence is a high prevalence disease in the general population. The aims of this study were to analyse which severity grading systems of faecal incontinence are used in Spain and to find out if there are differences in their use among specialists who manage these patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey was sent to all hospitals of the National Health Service in Spain in order to study the attitudes and opinions of general surgery and gastroenterology specialists regarding the clinical evaluation of patients with faecal incontinence.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine questionnaires were returned fully completed (65 surgeons and 34 gastroenterologists). Only 41.8% of responders used a diary card systematically (46.8% surgeons vs. 32.3% gastroenterologists; p = 0.05). The Wexner score is the most widely grading system used in clinical practice (85.8% surgeons vs. 50% gastroenterologists; p = 0.01). The most relevant issues in the evaluation of these patients were considered: Type of faecal incontinence, frequency of leakage and quality of life. Finally, 85.5% of those questioned said that the universal acceptance of severity grading systems by all specialists would be an improvement, and 98.9% considered it useful to start a national plan of information regarding clinical evaluation of faecal incontinence in Spain.
CONCLUSIONS: There is variability in how faecal incontinence is evaluated among specialists in Spain.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey was sent to all hospitals of the National Health Service in Spain in order to study the attitudes and opinions of general surgery and gastroenterology specialists regarding the clinical evaluation of patients with faecal incontinence.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine questionnaires were returned fully completed (65 surgeons and 34 gastroenterologists). Only 41.8% of responders used a diary card systematically (46.8% surgeons vs. 32.3% gastroenterologists; p = 0.05). The Wexner score is the most widely grading system used in clinical practice (85.8% surgeons vs. 50% gastroenterologists; p = 0.01). The most relevant issues in the evaluation of these patients were considered: Type of faecal incontinence, frequency of leakage and quality of life. Finally, 85.5% of those questioned said that the universal acceptance of severity grading systems by all specialists would be an improvement, and 98.9% considered it useful to start a national plan of information regarding clinical evaluation of faecal incontinence in Spain.
CONCLUSIONS: There is variability in how faecal incontinence is evaluated among specialists in Spain.