Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2024
Remote assessment of the Penn computerised neurocognitive battery in individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
White L K, Hillman N, Ruparel K, Moore T M, Gallagher R S, McClellan E J, Roalf D R, Scott J C, Calkins M E, McGinn D E, Giunta V, Tran O, Crowley T B, Zackai E H, Emanuel B S, McDonald-McGinn D M, Gur R E, Gur R C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive functioning is an integral phenotype of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome relating to severity of psychopathology and outcomes. A neurocognitive battery that could be administered remotely to assess multiple cognitive domains would be especially beneficial to research on rare genetic variants, where in-person assessment can be unavailable or burdensome. The current study compares in-person and remote assessments of the Penn computerised neurocognitive battery (CNB).
METHODS: Participants (mean age = 17.82, SD = 6.94 years; 48% female) completed the CNB either in-person at a laboratory (n = 222) or remotely (n = 162).
RESULTS: Results show that accuracy of CNB performance was equivalent across the two testing locations, while slight differences in speed were detected in 3 of the 11 tasks.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the CNB can be used in remote settings to assess multiple neurocognitive domains.
METHODS: Participants (mean age = 17.82, SD = 6.94 years; 48% female) completed the CNB either in-person at a laboratory (n = 222) or remotely (n = 162).
RESULTS: Results show that accuracy of CNB performance was equivalent across the two testing locations, while slight differences in speed were detected in 3 of the 11 tasks.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the CNB can be used in remote settings to assess multiple neurocognitive domains.