Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026
3D Printing for Mitral Valve Disease: A Systematic Review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pavlykova-Chertovska Anastasiia, Cheheili Sobbi Shokoufeh, Lazoryshynets Vasyl, Sardari Nia Peyman
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Mitral valve disease remains one of the most prevalent and complex cardiac conditions, with treatment strategies varying based on anatomical and pathological factors. The heterogeneity in mitral valve morphology complicates standardized treatment, highlighting the importance of procedural planning and surgical training. This systematic review evaluates current techniques, materials, and clinical applications of 3D printing in mitral valve disease, with a focus on procedural planning and simulation.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted to identify studies published from 1996 to August 2025. A total of 63 studies were included, all involving 3D printing technologies related to mitral valve disease. Extracted data covered imaging modalities, software tools, printing techniques, materials used, total time required for model creation, and clinical applications.
RESULTS: CT, 3D transoesophageal echocardiography, and MRI were the main imaging modalities, with CT being the most common. Data segmentation and model generation were performed using software such as Mimics, 3D Slicer, and Philips QLAB. The primary 3D printing techniques were stereolithography, fused deposition modelling, and PolyJet, using photopolymer resins and thermoplastics. Total processing time-from image acquisition to model completion-ranged from 45 min to 72 h, depending on complexity. Applications included procedural planning, surgical training, and the development of medical and simulation-based educational devices.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D printing enhances mitral valve surgery by enabling precise planning and training. Although challenges like standardization and accessibility persist, advances in imaging, software, and materials are expected to expand its clinical impact.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted to identify studies published from 1996 to August 2025. A total of 63 studies were included, all involving 3D printing technologies related to mitral valve disease. Extracted data covered imaging modalities, software tools, printing techniques, materials used, total time required for model creation, and clinical applications.
RESULTS: CT, 3D transoesophageal echocardiography, and MRI were the main imaging modalities, with CT being the most common. Data segmentation and model generation were performed using software such as Mimics, 3D Slicer, and Philips QLAB. The primary 3D printing techniques were stereolithography, fused deposition modelling, and PolyJet, using photopolymer resins and thermoplastics. Total processing time-from image acquisition to model completion-ranged from 45 min to 72 h, depending on complexity. Applications included procedural planning, surgical training, and the development of medical and simulation-based educational devices.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D printing enhances mitral valve surgery by enabling precise planning and training. Although challenges like standardization and accessibility persist, advances in imaging, software, and materials are expected to expand its clinical impact.