MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/jcm11226821

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical medicine · 2022

ECMO Support in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Risk Factors for Mortality.

Rajsic Sasa, Breitkopf Robert, Bukumiric Zoran, Treml Benedikt

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (va-ECMO) is a specialized temporary support for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. The true value of this potentially lifesaving modality is still a subject of debate. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the overall in-hospital mortality and identify potential risk factors for mortality.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 453 patients supported with va-ECMO over a period of 14 years who were admitted to intensive care units of a tertiary university center in Austria.

RESULTS

We observed in-hospital mortality of 40% for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. Hemorrhage, ECMO initiation on weekends, higher SAPS III score, and sepsis were identified as significant risk factors for mortality. Hemorrhage was the most common adverse event (46%), with major bleeding events dominating in deceased patients. Thromboembolic events occurred in 25% of patients, followed by sepsis (18%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the rates of complications are substantial, a well-selected proportion of patients with refractory cardiogenic shock can be rescued from probable death. The reported risk factors could be used to increase the awareness of clinicians towards the development of new therapeutic concepts that may reduce their incidence.

Для цитирования: Rajsic Sasa, Breitkopf Robert, Bukumiric Zoran, Treml Benedikt. ECMO Support in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Risk Factors for Mortality.. Journal of clinical medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226821.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.