MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/09636625221146269

Медицинская библиотека · Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2023

Anti-intellectualism amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The discursive elements and sources of anti-Fauci tweets.

Chen Yingying, Long Jacob, Jun Jungmi, Kim Sei-Hill, Zain Ali, Piacentine Colin

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Anti-intellectualism (resentment, hostility, and mistrust of experts) has become a growing concern during the pandemic. Using topic modeling and supervised machine learning, this study examines the elements and sources of anti-Fauci tweets as a case of anti-intellectual discourse on social media. Based on the theoretical framework of science-related populism, we identified three anti-intellectual discursive elements in anti-Fauci tweets: people-scientist antagonism, delegitimizing the motivation of scientists, and delegitimizing the knowledge of scientists. Delegitimizing the motivation of scientists appeared the most in anti-Fauci tweets. Politicians, conservative news media, and non-institutional actors (e.g. individuals and grassroots advocacy organizations) co-constructed the production and circulation of anti-intellectual discourses on Twitter. Anti-intellectual discourses resurged even under Twitter's content moderation mechanism. We discuss theoretical and practical implications for building public trust in scientists, effective science communication, and content moderation policies on social media.

Для цитирования: Chen Yingying, Long Jacob, Jun Jungmi, Kim Sei-Hill, Zain Ali, Piacentine Colin. Anti-intellectualism amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The discursive elements and sources of anti-Fauci tweets.. Public understanding of science (Bristol, England). 2023. DOI: 10.1177/09636625221146269.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.