MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ccm.0000000000007085

Медицинская библиотека · Critical care medicine · 2026

Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Caring for Older Adults in the ICU.

Ferrante Lauren E, Chaudhuri Dipayan, Laiya Carayannopoulos Kallirroi, Jain Snigdha, Tate Judith A, Álvarez-Espinoza Evelyn, Austin C Adrian, Burry Lisa, Devinney Michael J, Ehlenbach William J, Happ Mary Beth, Hope Aluko A, Hua May, Kho Michelle E, Palakshappa Jessica A, Scheunemann Leslie P, Sinvani Liron, Stahl Barbara, Wang Sophia, Wunsch Hannah, Rochwerg Bram, Brummel Nathan E

СтатьяКлинические рекомендацииПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

RATIONALE: Older adults (those 65 years old or greater) compose a substantial proportion of the ICU population. As older adults with critical illness possess unique factors and considerations relevant to their care and outcomes, there is a need for evidence-based recommendations to guide critical care clinicians in the care of older ICU patients.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this guideline is to develop evidence-based recommendations addressing the care of older adults during and after critical illness.

DESIGN

The American College of Critical Care Medicine Board convened a 22-member interprofessional panel, comprising physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, a pharmacist, physical therapist, occupational therapist, and a patient representative. The panel included two expert methodologists specialized in developing evidence-based recommendations in alignment with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Conflict-of-interest policies were strictly followed during all phases of guideline development including task force selection and voting.

METHODS

The panel members prioritized five Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes questions. A systematic review was conducted for each question to identify the best available evidence, synthesize the evidence and assess the certainty of evidence using GRADE. The evidence-to-decision framework was used to formulate recommendations.

RESULTS

The panel generated two conditional recommendations and three "no recommendation" statements. The conditional recommendations are: 1) We suggest a geriatric model of care for all older adults admitted to the ICU and 2) We suggest not using antipsychotic medications for the prevention of delirium in older adults with critical illness. The three "no recommendation" statements are: 1) We make no recommendation regarding specialized post-ICU follow-up for older survivors of critical illness, 2) For older adults (age 65 and over) admitted to the ICU with vasodilatory shock, we make no recommendation with regard to targeting a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 60-65 mm Hg as compared with usual care (MAP target > 65 mm Hg), and 3) We make no recommendation regarding the use of antipsychotic medication in the treatment of delirium in older adults with critical illness.

CONCLUSIONS

The guideline panel developed recommendations on caring for older adults during and after critical illness. Areas for future research were also identified during the guideline process.

Для цитирования: Ferrante Lauren E, Chaudhuri Dipayan, Laiya Carayannopoulos Kallirroi, Jain Snigdha, Tate Judith A, Álvarez-Espinoza Evelyn, Austin C Adrian, Burry Lisa, Devinney Michael J, Ehlenbach William J, Happ Mary Beth, Hope Aluko A, Hua May, Kho Michelle E, Palakshappa Jessica A, Scheunemann Leslie P, Sinvani Liron, Stahl Barbara, Wang Sophia, Wunsch Hannah, Rochwerg Bram, Brummel Nathan E. Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Caring for Older Adults in the ICU.. Critical care medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000007085.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.