Brain research · 2019
Assessment of anti-nociceptive effect of allopurinol in a neuropathic pain model.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abad Ahmad Safari Sultan, Falanji Farahnaz, Ghanbarabadi Mustafa, Rad Abolfazl, Nazemi Samad, Pejhan Akbar, Amin Bahareh
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the antinociceptive effect of allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, in the chronic constriction injury (CCI) to sciatic nerve rat model of neuropathic pain.
METHODS: Allopurinol administration (30, 60, 90 mg/kg, i.p.) was started at the time of nerve injury, and given for 14 continuous days. Behavioural tests (von Frey filaments, acetone drop, hot plate) were conducted on days 0, 3, 7, 10 and 14. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis was performed on the spinal cord of CCI animals on day 14. The contribution of adenosine (A) receptors was tested using the methylxanthine theophylline, a non-selective A receptor antagonist and 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX), a selective A1 receptor antagonist, administered 30 min before allopurinol on day 10.
RESULTS: CCI of the sciatic nerve resulted in a persistent mechanical allodynia, cold allodynia, and heat hyperalgesia, together with increased iNOS, bax/bcl2, iba-1 and TNF-α expression in the lumbar spinal cord of animals. The highest-dose group of allopurinol (90 mg/kg) attenuated pain-like behaviors compared with the normal saline treated group, and this was accompanied by normalization of iNOS, bax/bcl2, caspase 3, iba-1 and TNF-α gene expression changes. DPCPX and theophylline reversed the thermal anti-hyperalgesic effect of allopurinol. In contrast, the mechanical anti-allodynic effect was only prevented by theophylline.
CONCLUSION: Allopurinol through interacting with different aspects of neuropathic pain, via anti-oxidant effects, protection against neuroinflammation, and activating adenosine receptors, could be useful in the treatment of patients with neuropathic pain.
METHODS: Allopurinol administration (30, 60, 90 mg/kg, i.p.) was started at the time of nerve injury, and given for 14 continuous days. Behavioural tests (von Frey filaments, acetone drop, hot plate) were conducted on days 0, 3, 7, 10 and 14. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis was performed on the spinal cord of CCI animals on day 14. The contribution of adenosine (A) receptors was tested using the methylxanthine theophylline, a non-selective A receptor antagonist and 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX), a selective A1 receptor antagonist, administered 30 min before allopurinol on day 10.
RESULTS: CCI of the sciatic nerve resulted in a persistent mechanical allodynia, cold allodynia, and heat hyperalgesia, together with increased iNOS, bax/bcl2, iba-1 and TNF-α expression in the lumbar spinal cord of animals. The highest-dose group of allopurinol (90 mg/kg) attenuated pain-like behaviors compared with the normal saline treated group, and this was accompanied by normalization of iNOS, bax/bcl2, caspase 3, iba-1 and TNF-α gene expression changes. DPCPX and theophylline reversed the thermal anti-hyperalgesic effect of allopurinol. In contrast, the mechanical anti-allodynic effect was only prevented by theophylline.
CONCLUSION: Allopurinol through interacting with different aspects of neuropathic pain, via anti-oxidant effects, protection against neuroinflammation, and activating adenosine receptors, could be useful in the treatment of patients with neuropathic pain.