Acta cytologica · 1997
Identifying cytologic characteristics and grading endocervical columnar cell abnormalities. A study aided by high-definition television.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Aspert-van Erp A J, van't Hof-Grootenboer B E, Brugal G, Vooijs G P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To test the ability of cytotechnologists to recognize and accurately interpret selected architectural, cellular and nuclear features presented on a high-definition television (HDTV) and to make a reliable diagnosis with HDTV.
STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1,122 features considered diagnostic of different endocervical columnar cell abnormalities were selected from 50 smears from 48 women with the help of a motor-driven-stage microscope by five observers who had knowledge of the final diagnosis. The selected and stored features were presented on an HDTV and evaluated in five successive sessions without knowledge of the final diagnosis.
RESULTS: Specific types of features were correctly identified in a high number of cases. Considerable interobserver variability was demonstrated in the scoring of grades of expression of features. Overrated and under-rated monitor diagnoses were related to overvalued and undervalued features. From a group of 437 images that were correctly diagnosed by four or five observers, five features proved to be highly related to the correct diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: Observers were capable of making a reliable diagnosis on features, selected by other observers, when presented on an HDTV. An overall correct diagnosis was made in 93% of cases.
STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1,122 features considered diagnostic of different endocervical columnar cell abnormalities were selected from 50 smears from 48 women with the help of a motor-driven-stage microscope by five observers who had knowledge of the final diagnosis. The selected and stored features were presented on an HDTV and evaluated in five successive sessions without knowledge of the final diagnosis.
RESULTS: Specific types of features were correctly identified in a high number of cases. Considerable interobserver variability was demonstrated in the scoring of grades of expression of features. Overrated and under-rated monitor diagnoses were related to overvalued and undervalued features. From a group of 437 images that were correctly diagnosed by four or five observers, five features proved to be highly related to the correct diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: Observers were capable of making a reliable diagnosis on features, selected by other observers, when presented on an HDTV. An overall correct diagnosis was made in 93% of cases.