Chorioamnionitis risk and neonatal outcome in preterm premature rupture of membranes.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to compare the neonatal outcome in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes with and without clinical chorioamnionitis.
STUDY
DESIGN
This is a retrospective study that included 254 pregnant women with preterm rupture of membranes. The study group was divided according to the presence or absence of clinical chorioamnionitis defined as the presence of two or more of the following criteria: maternal temperature >38 degrees C on two or more occasions > or =1 h apart, maternal tachycardia (> or =120 beats/min), uterine tenderness, foul smelling amniotic fluid, maternal leukocytosis > or =20,000 mm(-3) with bands and positive C reactive protein. Also the study population was divided according to the use of tocolysis. Exclusion criteria included multiple pregnancy, fetal congenital anomalies, diabetes mellitus and severe preeclampsia. Amniotic fluid was collected from the cervix or from the transabdominal amniocentesis. Antibiotics and tocolysis were used according to the hospital protocols. Parametric and nonparametric statistics were used for comparisons.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in birth weight, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, rates of respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage and necrotizing enterocolitis between patients with and without clinical chorioamnionitis or between women who received tocolysis and the ones that did not receive tocolysis. In cases of clinical chorioamnionitis and when tocolysis was used the neonates stayed longer in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
CONCLUSION
Patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes and clinical chorioamnionitis have similar neonatal outcomes than the ones without clinical chorioamnionitis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.