Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019
Brief Report: Durability of the Effect of Financial Incentives on HIV Viral Load Suppression and Continuity in Care: HPTN 065 Study.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El-Sadr Wafaa M, Beauchamp Geetha, Hall H Irene, Torian Lucia V, Zingman Barry S, Lum Garret, Elion Richard A, Buchacz Kate, Burns David, Zerbe Allison, Gamble Theresa, Donnell Deborah J, HPTN 065 Study
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Results from the HPTN 065 study showed that financial incentives (FI) were associated with significantly higher viral load suppression and higher levels of engagement in care among patients at HIV care sites randomized to FI versus sites randomized to standard of care (SOC). We assessed HIV viral suppression and continuity in care after intervention withdrawal to determine the durability of FI on these outcomes.
SETTING: A total of 37 HIV test and 39 HIV care sites in the Bronx, New York, and Washington, DC, participated in the study.
METHODS: Laboratory data reported to the US National HIV Surveillance System were used to determine site-level viral suppression and continuity in care outcomes. Postintervention effects were assessed for the 3 quarters after discontinuation of FI. Generalized estimation equations were used to compare FI and SOC site-level outcomes after intervention withdrawal.
RESULTS: After FI withdrawal, a trend remained for an increase in viral suppression by 2.7% (-0.3%, 5.6%, P = 0.076) at FI versus SOC sites, decreasing from the 3.8% increase noted during implementation of the intervention. The significant increase in continuity in care during the FI intervention was sustained after intervention with 7.5% (P = 0.007) higher continuity in care at FI versus SOC sites.
CONCLUSIONS: After the withdrawal of FI, findings at the 9-months postintervention withdrawal from this large study showed evidence of durable effects of FI on continuity in care, with trend for continued higher viral suppression. These findings are promising for adoption of such interventions to enhance key HIV-related care outcomes.
SETTING: A total of 37 HIV test and 39 HIV care sites in the Bronx, New York, and Washington, DC, participated in the study.
METHODS: Laboratory data reported to the US National HIV Surveillance System were used to determine site-level viral suppression and continuity in care outcomes. Postintervention effects were assessed for the 3 quarters after discontinuation of FI. Generalized estimation equations were used to compare FI and SOC site-level outcomes after intervention withdrawal.
RESULTS: After FI withdrawal, a trend remained for an increase in viral suppression by 2.7% (-0.3%, 5.6%, P = 0.076) at FI versus SOC sites, decreasing from the 3.8% increase noted during implementation of the intervention. The significant increase in continuity in care during the FI intervention was sustained after intervention with 7.5% (P = 0.007) higher continuity in care at FI versus SOC sites.
CONCLUSIONS: After the withdrawal of FI, findings at the 9-months postintervention withdrawal from this large study showed evidence of durable effects of FI on continuity in care, with trend for continued higher viral suppression. These findings are promising for adoption of such interventions to enhance key HIV-related care outcomes.