Medicina · 2026
[Evidence-based health policies: The National Commission for Health Technology Assessment and Clinical Excellence in Argentina].
СтатьяОбзорАннотация на английскомНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Donato Manuel, Montero Guadalupe, Hasdeu Santiago, Dorati Cristian, Torales Santiago
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The National Commission for Health Technology Assessment and Clinical Excellence has driven improvements in transparency, equity, and technical standards for access to health technologies in Argentina. The objective was to comprehensively assess its impact and utility, addressing the gap in evidence regarding its effects on clinical practice and health management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive mixed-methods study was designed, combining a narrative review of the literature and surveys administered to key stakeholders in the health system. The outcomes, values and impacts of the commission's work were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The commission successfully established principles of transparency and equity in the prioritization and recommendation processes for health technologies, producing over 100 reports and clinical practice guidelines achieving broad acceptance among professionals and decision makers. Its actions consolidated methodological standards and reinforced informed, equitable decision-making, although systematic measurement of its effects on clinical management and health budgets remains a challenge.
CONCLUSION: This work constitutes the first comprehensive evaluation of the commission's performance, highlighting its strategic role and the need to deepen objective metrics to enhance its influence across the Argentine health system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive mixed-methods study was designed, combining a narrative review of the literature and surveys administered to key stakeholders in the health system. The outcomes, values and impacts of the commission's work were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The commission successfully established principles of transparency and equity in the prioritization and recommendation processes for health technologies, producing over 100 reports and clinical practice guidelines achieving broad acceptance among professionals and decision makers. Its actions consolidated methodological standards and reinforced informed, equitable decision-making, although systematic measurement of its effects on clinical management and health budgets remains a challenge.
CONCLUSION: This work constitutes the first comprehensive evaluation of the commission's performance, highlighting its strategic role and the need to deepen objective metrics to enhance its influence across the Argentine health system.