Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland : 1960) · 2021
LOOP DIURETICS IN HEART FAILURE: EVIDENCE-BASED CHOICE.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rоsul Мaryana М, Bletskan Мiroslava М, Ivano Nataliya V, Korabelschykova Marina O
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim: Of the article is to conduct a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of torasemide and furosemide in patients with heart failure.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: Analysis of the existing clinical trials and meta-analyzes that combine the results of the completed studies aimed at the investigation of comparative efficacy of furosemide and torasemide in patients with heart failure (НF).
CONCLUSION: Conclusions: There is enough convincing evidence to speak about the advantages of torasemide over furosemide both in terms of its pharmacological properties and taking into account the reduction of hospitalizations, functional progress and improvement in the quality of life of patients with НF. The safety profile of torasemide is more favorable, as it is associated with a reduced risk of hypokalemia compared to furosemide. The abovementioned facts favor the use of torasemide in patients with symptomatic НF, as well as the transition from furosemide to torasemide in patients with edema caused by НF, which remain uncontrolled despite receiving optimal doses of furosemide.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: Analysis of the existing clinical trials and meta-analyzes that combine the results of the completed studies aimed at the investigation of comparative efficacy of furosemide and torasemide in patients with heart failure (НF).
CONCLUSION: Conclusions: There is enough convincing evidence to speak about the advantages of torasemide over furosemide both in terms of its pharmacological properties and taking into account the reduction of hospitalizations, functional progress and improvement in the quality of life of patients with НF. The safety profile of torasemide is more favorable, as it is associated with a reduced risk of hypokalemia compared to furosemide. The abovementioned facts favor the use of torasemide in patients with symptomatic НF, as well as the transition from furosemide to torasemide in patients with edema caused by НF, which remain uncontrolled despite receiving optimal doses of furosemide.