Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2026
Out-of-pocket expenditure and catastrophic health expenditure in patients of leprosy at a tertiary care center in India.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kavita Kavita, Singh Sukhdeep, Malhi Kittu, Upreti Manisha, Saini Sushma, Ghai Arushi, Mohindra Ritin, Narang Tarun, Dogra Sunil
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Leprosy continues to impose a significant clinical and socioeconomic burden. Despite free multidrug therapy, patients incur substantial out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE), leading to catastrophic health expenditure (CHE). Evidence on the economic burden of leprosy in India remains limited.
METHODS: A pilot prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center in North India, enrolling 56 patients with leprosy. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, direct and indirect healthcare costs, and income were collected.
RESULTS: The study population had a median age of 30 years, with 73% males, and 68% from rural areas. Multibacillary disease predominated (93%), with complications in 73.2% and a median diagnostic delay of 24 months. Median monthly household income was Indian Rupees (₹)12 000, while median OOPE was ₹1625, largely driven by medicines and travel. CHE was observed in 55.4% of patients. OOPE was significantly higher in multibacillary cases compared with paucibacillary disease (P = .04). A considerable proportion of patients resorted to borrowing money, indicating financial distress.
CONCLUSION: Leprosy imposes a substantial financial burden, with more than one-half of patients experiencing CHE. Strengthening early diagnosis, decentralizing care, and improving financial protection mechanisms are essential to mitigate economic hardship.
METHODS: A pilot prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center in North India, enrolling 56 patients with leprosy. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, direct and indirect healthcare costs, and income were collected.
RESULTS: The study population had a median age of 30 years, with 73% males, and 68% from rural areas. Multibacillary disease predominated (93%), with complications in 73.2% and a median diagnostic delay of 24 months. Median monthly household income was Indian Rupees (₹)12 000, while median OOPE was ₹1625, largely driven by medicines and travel. CHE was observed in 55.4% of patients. OOPE was significantly higher in multibacillary cases compared with paucibacillary disease (P = .04). A considerable proportion of patients resorted to borrowing money, indicating financial distress.
CONCLUSION: Leprosy imposes a substantial financial burden, with more than one-half of patients experiencing CHE. Strengthening early diagnosis, decentralizing care, and improving financial protection mechanisms are essential to mitigate economic hardship.