Neuro-degenerative diseases · 2018
Characteristics of Early Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Patients with Multiple System Atrophy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Hyun Haeng, Seo Han Gil, Kim Kwang-Dong, Lee Seung Hak, Lee Woo Hyung, Oh Byung-Mo, Lee Woong-Woo, Kim Yoon, Kim Aryun, Kim Han-Joon, Jeon Beomseok, Han Tai Ryoon
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Dysphagia, a symptom of multiple system atrophy (MSA), is a major clinical concern. In this study, we investigate the characteristics of early oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in patients with MSA, and the differences between MSA subtypes.
METHODS: Patients enrolled in the study had previously been diagnosed with MSA at the clinic of the Department of Neurology, and had been referred for a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), between 2005 and 2014, to check for dysphagia. The clinical characteristics and VFSS findings were analyzed and compared between the MSA subtypes.
RESULTS: This study enrolled 59 patients with MSA (24 men; 31 with MSA-P, 21 with MSA-C, and 7 with MSA-PC). Dysphagia symptoms were mostly limited to aspiration symptoms (90.48%) in patients with MSA-C, while difficulty in swallowing, increased mealtime, and drooling were frequent in those with MSA-P. The most common VFSS finding amongst patients was vallecular residue (n = 53, 89.8%), followed by penetration/aspiration (n = 40, 67.8%), and coating of the pharyngeal wall (n = 39, 66.1%). Comparison analysis between subtypes showed that apraxia and vallecular residue were more frequent and severe in MSA-P than in MSA-C (p = 0.033 and p = 0.010, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Understanding early OD characteristics in patients with MSA and the differences between MSA subtypes could be helpful in managing dysphagia in patients with MSA. Several dysphagia symptoms similar to those of Parkinson disease were frequently observed in MSA-P, but not in MSA-C. A follow-up study is needed to elucidate the natural course of OD in MSA patients and the difference between MSA subtypes.
METHODS: Patients enrolled in the study had previously been diagnosed with MSA at the clinic of the Department of Neurology, and had been referred for a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), between 2005 and 2014, to check for dysphagia. The clinical characteristics and VFSS findings were analyzed and compared between the MSA subtypes.
RESULTS: This study enrolled 59 patients with MSA (24 men; 31 with MSA-P, 21 with MSA-C, and 7 with MSA-PC). Dysphagia symptoms were mostly limited to aspiration symptoms (90.48%) in patients with MSA-C, while difficulty in swallowing, increased mealtime, and drooling were frequent in those with MSA-P. The most common VFSS finding amongst patients was vallecular residue (n = 53, 89.8%), followed by penetration/aspiration (n = 40, 67.8%), and coating of the pharyngeal wall (n = 39, 66.1%). Comparison analysis between subtypes showed that apraxia and vallecular residue were more frequent and severe in MSA-P than in MSA-C (p = 0.033 and p = 0.010, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Understanding early OD characteristics in patients with MSA and the differences between MSA subtypes could be helpful in managing dysphagia in patients with MSA. Several dysphagia symptoms similar to those of Parkinson disease were frequently observed in MSA-P, but not in MSA-C. A follow-up study is needed to elucidate the natural course of OD in MSA patients and the difference between MSA subtypes.