Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 2025
Evaluation of Dynamic Intraocular Lens Movement Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Movie Analysis.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ohira Ryo, Masuda Yoichiro, Okude Sachiyo, Iida Masanobu, Ichihara Kosuke, Komatsu Koji, Shiba Takuya, Iwaki Hisaharu, Oki Kotaro, Nakano Tadashi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To introduce a method to quantitatively assess dynamic intraocular lens (IOL) positioning using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).
METHODS: This retrospective observational study analyzed 13 eyes with in-the-bag IOL fixation between May and December 2023 at the Ophthalmology Department of The Jikei University School of Medicine Hospital in Tokyo. Using ASOCT imaging during horizontal eye movements, dynamic IOL and iris movement angles were quantitatively assessed, compared with conventional static IOL tilt and decentration, and their interrelations were examined.
RESULTS: Static measurements revealed an average IOL tilt of 4.1 ± 1.3 degrees (range: 1.9 to 5.9 degrees) and decentration of 0.17 ± 0.10 mm (range: 0.02 to 0.38 mm). Dynamic analysis showed IOL movement angles of 2.6 ± 2.1 degrees (range: 0.3 to 7.3 degrees) and iris movement angles of 4.1 ± 3.4 degrees (range: 0.3 to 10.3 degrees). No correlation was found between the dynamic IOL movement angle and static IOL tilt and decentration, with some cases showing discrepancies (Spearman's rank correlation, P > .05). However, a strong positive correlation was observed between the dynamic IOL and iris movement angles (Spearman's rank correlation, R = 0.83, P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the static IOL tilt and decentration were within normal ranges, significant oscillations in IOL positioning were detected, highlighting the importance of dynamic assessment for evaluating IOL stability during daily activities. This study underscores the potential value of dynamic evaluation of IOL position in routine clinical practice. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(5):e444-e450.].
METHODS: This retrospective observational study analyzed 13 eyes with in-the-bag IOL fixation between May and December 2023 at the Ophthalmology Department of The Jikei University School of Medicine Hospital in Tokyo. Using ASOCT imaging during horizontal eye movements, dynamic IOL and iris movement angles were quantitatively assessed, compared with conventional static IOL tilt and decentration, and their interrelations were examined.
RESULTS: Static measurements revealed an average IOL tilt of 4.1 ± 1.3 degrees (range: 1.9 to 5.9 degrees) and decentration of 0.17 ± 0.10 mm (range: 0.02 to 0.38 mm). Dynamic analysis showed IOL movement angles of 2.6 ± 2.1 degrees (range: 0.3 to 7.3 degrees) and iris movement angles of 4.1 ± 3.4 degrees (range: 0.3 to 10.3 degrees). No correlation was found between the dynamic IOL movement angle and static IOL tilt and decentration, with some cases showing discrepancies (Spearman's rank correlation, P > .05). However, a strong positive correlation was observed between the dynamic IOL and iris movement angles (Spearman's rank correlation, R = 0.83, P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the static IOL tilt and decentration were within normal ranges, significant oscillations in IOL positioning were detected, highlighting the importance of dynamic assessment for evaluating IOL stability during daily activities. This study underscores the potential value of dynamic evaluation of IOL position in routine clinical practice. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(5):e444-e450.].