Current eye research · 2002
Non-preserved 1% lidocaine solution has less antibacterial properties than currently available anaesthetic eye-drops.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Labetoulle Marc, Frau Eric, Offret Hervé, Nordmann Patrice, Naas Thierry
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Some anaesthetics inhibit bacterial growth, and thus may lead to low rates of positive cultures from bacterial keratitis. Antibacterial properties of lidocaine were compared with those of oxybuprocaine or tetracaine, either in current commercial eye lotions or in extemporaneous solutions.
METHODS: Forty-eight bacterial strains were used to determine the minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of four commercial eye lotions containing oxybuprocaine or tetracaine, of a non-ophthalmic 1% lidocaine commercial solution and of extemporaneously prepared solutions of oxybuprocaine, tetracaine, lidocaine and benzalkonium.
RESULTS: Most strains had their growth inhibited by 0.2% oxybuprocaine or 0.4% tetracaine, which corresponds to a 1/2 dilution of the commercial eye-drops. Bacterial growth was still observed with a 1% lidocaine solution.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently available anaesthetic eye-drops that are used before corneal specimen collection may lead to false-negative bacterial cultures. Conversely, a non-preserved 1% lidocaine solution might be more appropriate in corneal specimen collection.
METHODS: Forty-eight bacterial strains were used to determine the minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of four commercial eye lotions containing oxybuprocaine or tetracaine, of a non-ophthalmic 1% lidocaine commercial solution and of extemporaneously prepared solutions of oxybuprocaine, tetracaine, lidocaine and benzalkonium.
RESULTS: Most strains had their growth inhibited by 0.2% oxybuprocaine or 0.4% tetracaine, which corresponds to a 1/2 dilution of the commercial eye-drops. Bacterial growth was still observed with a 1% lidocaine solution.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently available anaesthetic eye-drops that are used before corneal specimen collection may lead to false-negative bacterial cultures. Conversely, a non-preserved 1% lidocaine solution might be more appropriate in corneal specimen collection.