The Annals of thoracic surgery · 1997
Influence of pulmonic position on durability of bioprosthetic heart valves.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fukada J, Morishita K, Komatsu K, Abe T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The insertion of bioprosthetic valves into the pulmonic position is not performed commonly because of uncertainty concerning the necessity and durability of such valves.
METHODS: We reviewed the long-term outcome of 10 patients who underwent pulmonary valve replacement with bioprostheses between March 1985 and March 1997. A Carpentier-Edwards supraannular bioprosthesis was used in 7 patients, a Hancock II bioprosthesis was used in 2 patients, and a Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis was used in 1 patient. The mean patient age at the time of pulmonary valve replacement was 38.9 +/- 16.3 years (range, 15 to 63 years). The diagnoses were pulmonary valvular regurgitation after corrective surgery for tetralogy of Fallot in 7 patients, right ventricular outflow tract stenosis and absent right pulmonary artery combined with a double-outlet right ventricle in 1 patient, pulmonary valvular regurgitation with pulmonary artery dilatation in 1 patient, and aortic valve stenosis treated with our modification of the Ross procedure using a pulmonary bioprosthesis in 1 patient. Survivors were followed up for a mean of 5 years and 5 months.
RESULTS: One patient underwent reoperation because of infective endocarditis of the bioprosthesis. No bioprosthetic valve dysfunction has been observed on Doppler echocardiography during a maximum follow-up period of 12.2 years, except in the patient who underwent replacement at 15 years of age.
CONCLUSIONS: Bioprostheses in the pulmonic position are durable in adult patients because they face a minimal hemodynamic load, but they may undergo early leaflet degeneration in younger patients.
METHODS: We reviewed the long-term outcome of 10 patients who underwent pulmonary valve replacement with bioprostheses between March 1985 and March 1997. A Carpentier-Edwards supraannular bioprosthesis was used in 7 patients, a Hancock II bioprosthesis was used in 2 patients, and a Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis was used in 1 patient. The mean patient age at the time of pulmonary valve replacement was 38.9 +/- 16.3 years (range, 15 to 63 years). The diagnoses were pulmonary valvular regurgitation after corrective surgery for tetralogy of Fallot in 7 patients, right ventricular outflow tract stenosis and absent right pulmonary artery combined with a double-outlet right ventricle in 1 patient, pulmonary valvular regurgitation with pulmonary artery dilatation in 1 patient, and aortic valve stenosis treated with our modification of the Ross procedure using a pulmonary bioprosthesis in 1 patient. Survivors were followed up for a mean of 5 years and 5 months.
RESULTS: One patient underwent reoperation because of infective endocarditis of the bioprosthesis. No bioprosthetic valve dysfunction has been observed on Doppler echocardiography during a maximum follow-up period of 12.2 years, except in the patient who underwent replacement at 15 years of age.
CONCLUSIONS: Bioprostheses in the pulmonic position are durable in adult patients because they face a minimal hemodynamic load, but they may undergo early leaflet degeneration in younger patients.