Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
Efficacy of Wearable Single-Lead ECG Monitoring during Exercise Stress Testing: A Comparative Study.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Choi Hyo-In, Lee Seung Jae, Choi Jong Doo, Kim GyungChul, Lee Young-Shin, Lee Jong-Young
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Few comparative studies have evaluated wearable single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) devices and standard multi-lead ECG devices during exercise testing. This study aimed to validate the accuracy of a wearable single-lead ECG monitor for recording heart rate (HR) metrics during graded exercise tests (GXTs).
METHODS: A cohort of 50 patients at a tertiary hospital underwent GXT while simultaneously being equipped with wearable single- and conventional multi-lead ECGs. The concordance between these modalities was quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot analysis.
RESULTS: The minimum and average HR readings between the devices were generally consistent. Parameters such as ventricular ectopic beats and supraventricular ectopic beats showed strong agreement. However, the agreement for the Total QRS and Maximum RR was not sufficient. HR measurements across different stages of the exercise test showed sufficient agreement. Although not statistically significant, the standard multi-lead ECG devices exhibited higher noise levels compared to the wearable single-lead ECG devices.
CONCLUSIONS: Wearable single-lead ECG devices can reliably monitor HR and detect abnormal beats across a spectrum of exercise intensities, offering a viable alternative to traditional multi-lead systems.
METHODS: A cohort of 50 patients at a tertiary hospital underwent GXT while simultaneously being equipped with wearable single- and conventional multi-lead ECGs. The concordance between these modalities was quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot analysis.
RESULTS: The minimum and average HR readings between the devices were generally consistent. Parameters such as ventricular ectopic beats and supraventricular ectopic beats showed strong agreement. However, the agreement for the Total QRS and Maximum RR was not sufficient. HR measurements across different stages of the exercise test showed sufficient agreement. Although not statistically significant, the standard multi-lead ECG devices exhibited higher noise levels compared to the wearable single-lead ECG devices.
CONCLUSIONS: Wearable single-lead ECG devices can reliably monitor HR and detect abnormal beats across a spectrum of exercise intensities, offering a viable alternative to traditional multi-lead systems.