Actas urologicas espanolas · 2025
Cisplatin-induced AKI risk stratification and safety of dose reduction in urothelial carcinoma patients with renal impairment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamamoto S, Higa K, Kurokawa K, Bamba H, Kanaoka S, Nakamura K
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Cisplatin is essential for treating urothelial carcinoma but poses a high risk of AKI. Previous studies on CP-AKI risk factors had limitations. Gupta et al. (2020) proposed a simplified risk score linked to CP-AKI and 90-day survival, though validated only in patients with eGFR ≥50 mL/min.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study analyzed 70 patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with cisplatin. Patients with eGFR ≥50 mL/min received full-dose cisplatin (n = 47); those with eGFR 30-49 mL/min received a 75% reduced dose (n = 23), per Japanese guidelines. All received intravenous magnesium. AKI was defined as a ≥ twofold rise in serum creatinine or initiation of renal replacement therapy. The study also evaluated the Gupta score's association with 90-day survival in metastatic cases.
RESULTS: AKI occurred in 9.3% of the full-dose group and 4.5% of the reduced-dose group (p = 1.000). Higher Gupta scores were significantly associated with lower 90-day survival (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: A 75% cisplatin dose reduction in patients with moderate renal impairment appears safe and maintains efficacy without increasing AKI risk. These findings support personalized dosing and highlight the need to refine clinical guidelines. Further prospective studies are warranted.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study analyzed 70 patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with cisplatin. Patients with eGFR ≥50 mL/min received full-dose cisplatin (n = 47); those with eGFR 30-49 mL/min received a 75% reduced dose (n = 23), per Japanese guidelines. All received intravenous magnesium. AKI was defined as a ≥ twofold rise in serum creatinine or initiation of renal replacement therapy. The study also evaluated the Gupta score's association with 90-day survival in metastatic cases.
RESULTS: AKI occurred in 9.3% of the full-dose group and 4.5% of the reduced-dose group (p = 1.000). Higher Gupta scores were significantly associated with lower 90-day survival (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: A 75% cisplatin dose reduction in patients with moderate renal impairment appears safe and maintains efficacy without increasing AKI risk. These findings support personalized dosing and highlight the need to refine clinical guidelines. Further prospective studies are warranted.