MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1440-172x.2008.00725.x

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of nursing practice · 2008

Incontinence: managed or mismanaged in hospital settings?

Ostaszkiewicz Joan, O'Connell Beverly, Millar Lynne

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This paper reports the results of a survey of inpatients to determine the prevalence of their continence status and the overall management of their incontinence. A survey of 447 hospitalized adults was conducted and an audit of their medical records. Twenty-two per cent of patients reported urinary incontinence, 10% faecal incontinence, 78% nocturia, 23% urinary urgency and 11% trouble passing urine. Pre-existing bladder and bowel problems were reported by 34% and 26% of patients respectively. Sixty per cent of patients were using a continence product or device. There was a lack of documentation in the medical records about patients' continence status and about their pre-admission bowel and bladder status. The findings reveal that the management of incontinence in acute and subacute settings is suboptimal. There is a need to raise clinical awareness about incontinence in hospital settings and to implement a structured approach to its assessment and management. Furthermore, as the costs associated with the management or mismanagement of incontinence in hospital settings are not fully understood, there is a need for further research on this issue.

Для цитирования: Ostaszkiewicz Joan, O'Connell Beverly, Millar Lynne. Incontinence: managed or mismanaged in hospital settings?. International journal of nursing practice. 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-172x.2008.00725.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.