EBioMedicine · 2023
Treatment response to spironolactone in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a machine learning-based analysis of two randomized controlled trials.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kresoja Karl-Patrik, Unterhuber Matthias, Wachter Rolf, Rommel Karl-Philipp, Besler Christian, Shah Sanjiv, Thiele Holger, Edelmann Frank, Lurz Philipp
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Whether there is a subset of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) that benefit from spironolactone therapy is unclear. We applied a machine learning approach to identify responders and non-responders to spironolactone among patients with HFpEF in two large randomized clinical trials.
METHODS: Using a reiterative cluster allocating permutation approach, patients from the derivation cohort (Aldo-DHF) were identified according to their treatment response to spironolactone with respect to improvement in E/e'. Heterogenous features of response ('responders' and 'non-responders') were characterized by an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. XGBoost was used to predict treatment response in the validation cohort (TOPCAT). The primary endpoint of the validation cohort was a combined endpoint of cardiovascular mortality, aborted cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization. Patients with missing variables for the XGboost model were excluded from the validation analysis.
FINDINGS: Out of 422 patients from the derivation cohort, reiterative cluster allocating permutation identified 159 patients (38%) as spironolactone responders, in whom E/e' significantly improved (p = 0.005). Within the validation cohort (n = 525) spironolactone treatment significantly reduced the occurrence of the primary outcome among responders (n = 185, p log rank = 0.008), but not among patients in the non-responder group (n = 340, p log rank = 0.52).
INTERPRETATION: Machine learning approaches might aid in identifying HFpEF patients who are likely to show a favorable therapeutic response to spironolactone.
FUNDING: See Acknowledgements section at the end of the manuscript.
METHODS: Using a reiterative cluster allocating permutation approach, patients from the derivation cohort (Aldo-DHF) were identified according to their treatment response to spironolactone with respect to improvement in E/e'. Heterogenous features of response ('responders' and 'non-responders') were characterized by an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. XGBoost was used to predict treatment response in the validation cohort (TOPCAT). The primary endpoint of the validation cohort was a combined endpoint of cardiovascular mortality, aborted cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization. Patients with missing variables for the XGboost model were excluded from the validation analysis.
FINDINGS: Out of 422 patients from the derivation cohort, reiterative cluster allocating permutation identified 159 patients (38%) as spironolactone responders, in whom E/e' significantly improved (p = 0.005). Within the validation cohort (n = 525) spironolactone treatment significantly reduced the occurrence of the primary outcome among responders (n = 185, p log rank = 0.008), but not among patients in the non-responder group (n = 340, p log rank = 0.52).
INTERPRETATION: Machine learning approaches might aid in identifying HFpEF patients who are likely to show a favorable therapeutic response to spironolactone.
FUNDING: See Acknowledgements section at the end of the manuscript.