Two-week hypofractionated radiotherapy vs monthly single fraction radiotherapy in the palliation of advanced gynecological cancers-A phase 2 randomized study.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This prospective study compared hypofractionated 2-week radiotherapy with monthly single fraction radiotherapy in advanced gynecological cancers regarding symptom response, quality of life, objective response, and toxicity.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Patients with advanced/metastatic cervical, endometrial, vulvar, or vaginal cancer, unfit for curative therapy, were included. Radiotherapy used standard pelvic portals with Co-60 or 6 MV photons. The 2-week arm received 30 Gy/10 fractions; the single-fraction arm received 8 Gy, up to 3 fractions at monthly intervals. Symptoms, quality of life, and toxicity were assessed using ESAS-r, FACT, CTCAE v5.
RESULTS
Twenty-five patients were recruited in each arm. The median follow-up was 7.5 months. There was a significant improvement in the symptom scores at 1, 3 and 6 months in both the arms with no significant difference between the two treatment arms. The overall symptomatic response rates in the 2-week RT arm and SFRT arm were 82% for pelvic pain, 96% for vaginal bleeding and 90% for vaginal discharge. The quality of life scores at 1, 3 and 6 months showed significant improvement in all domains in both the arms. The emotional and physical well-being at 3 months were significantly better (P = 0.02 and 0.04) in the 2-week RT arm compared to the SFRT arm. There was no difference in the treatment toxicities.
CONCLUSION
Single fraction palliative radiation is comparable to 2-week hypo-fractionated radiotherapy with similar symptom control, toxicities, and improvement in quality of life. This holds significance especially in high volume centers in low middle income countries (LMIC).
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.