DOI 10.1007/s00256-026-05297-x
Dual-input deep learning bone age assessment in late adolescence using hand and knee radiographs.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To develop and internally evaluate an age-assisted dual-input model for bone age assessment in late adolescence using paired hand-wrist and knee radiographs.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
This single-center retrospective study included 547 adolescents aged 13-19 years with paired left hand-wrist and left knee radiographs (1094 images) acquired during routine clinical care. Data were split at the subject level into training, validation, and internal held-out test sets (70%/10%/20%; 382/55/110 subjects), keeping paired images from each subject in the same subset. A ShuffleNet v2-based model used hand and knee radiographs as visual inputs and incorporated chronological age and sex as auxiliary variables. The validation set was used for model selection, and final performance was evaluated on the internal held-out test set using mean absolute error, root mean square error, and intraclass correlation coefficient.
RESULTS
The final model achieved a mean absolute error of 3.77 months, root mean square error of 4.58 months, and intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.984, with 98.18% of predictions within 12 months of the reference standard. Internal ablation comparisons showed lower errors with paired hand-knee inputs and demographic variables than with single-site inputs.
CONCLUSION
In this single-center retrospective cohort, the age-assisted dual-input framework showed promising internal performance for late-adolescent bone age assessment. Independent multicenter external validation is required before clinical deployment, forensic/disputed-age use, or legal decision-making. Knee radiographs should be used only when already available or medically justified, not as routine additional imaging.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.