medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
Race and Socioeconomic Status Impact Survival from Early and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer.
СтатьяПрепринтНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Purrington Kristen, Hsieh Mei-Chin, Patil Siddhi, Mabvakure Batsirai, Ahn Jaeil, Zhang Rui, Ruterbusch Julie J, Samdani Rashmi, Lee Grace, Wenzlaff Angela, Latif Sophia, Dash Chiranjeev, Sartor Maureen, Schwartz Ann G, Stoffel Elena M, Rozek Laura S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) disproportionately affects non-Hispanic Black (NHB) Americans compared to Non-Hispanic White (NHW), with more cases arising before age 50. Racial disparities in outcomes reflect complex interactions among healthcare access, socioeconomic factors, and structural racism, yet analyses linking individual-level data for these factors to survival remain limited.
METHODS: We examined overall and CRC-specific survival among NHB and NHW patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2022 enrolled in the Disparities and Cancer Epidemiology (DANCE) cohort, a population-based study of CRC in metropolitan Detroit and Louisiana. Multivariable Cox regression and competing-risks models were used to assess the roles of race, age of onset, neighborhood deprivation, and stage on survival outcomes.
RESULTS: Among 1,019 CRC cases (57% NHB, 43% NHW), NHB patients were more likely to reside in high-deprivation neighborhoods, report lower household incomes, and present with right-sided tumors, though stage at diagnosis did not differ by race. In multivariable analysis, stage was the strongest predictor of survival, while neighborhood deprivation (per 10-unit ADI increase: HR = 1.14) was independently associated with worse survival; NHB race was not significantly associated with survival after adjustment. Younger age at diagnosis was associated with a survival advantage in regional-stage disease but paradoxically with worse survival in distant-stage disease, and higher deprivation predicted worse survival in both local and distant but not regional stage.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that socioeconomic factors, as measured by ADI and household income, accounts for some, but not all, of the disparities in survival between NHB and NHW CRC cases.
METHODS: We examined overall and CRC-specific survival among NHB and NHW patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2022 enrolled in the Disparities and Cancer Epidemiology (DANCE) cohort, a population-based study of CRC in metropolitan Detroit and Louisiana. Multivariable Cox regression and competing-risks models were used to assess the roles of race, age of onset, neighborhood deprivation, and stage on survival outcomes.
RESULTS: Among 1,019 CRC cases (57% NHB, 43% NHW), NHB patients were more likely to reside in high-deprivation neighborhoods, report lower household incomes, and present with right-sided tumors, though stage at diagnosis did not differ by race. In multivariable analysis, stage was the strongest predictor of survival, while neighborhood deprivation (per 10-unit ADI increase: HR = 1.14) was independently associated with worse survival; NHB race was not significantly associated with survival after adjustment. Younger age at diagnosis was associated with a survival advantage in regional-stage disease but paradoxically with worse survival in distant-stage disease, and higher deprivation predicted worse survival in both local and distant but not regional stage.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that socioeconomic factors, as measured by ADI and household income, accounts for some, but not all, of the disparities in survival between NHB and NHW CRC cases.