Neurosurgery · 2024
Antibiotic-Impregnated Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts Decrease Bacterial Shunt Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Систематический обзорСтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kovács Janka, Máté Vanda, Obeidat Mahmoud, Nagy Rita, Agócs Gergely, Kiss-Dala Szilvia, Hegyi Péter, Kiss-Miki Renáta, Párniczky Andrea, Müller Katalin E, Garami Miklós
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic-impregnated shunts seem to be beneficial in preventing bacterial infections and decreasing mortality by effectively inhibiting microbial growth in the shunt system and reducing the risk of shunt-associated infections. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated shunt catheters (AISC) in reducing the incidence of bacterial shunt infection in patients with hydrocephalus.
METHODS: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. A meta-analysis was conducted by searching 3 databases (PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL) for relevant randomized controlled trials and observational studies. We included all studies published until November 2022 in any language. The primary outcome was the rate of bacterial infections, whereas the rate of shunt failure was our secondary endpoint. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were calculated using a random-effects model.
RESULTS: A total of 27 articles with 27 266 shunt operations were included in this study. The results indicated that using AISC is significantly associated with reduction in infections (OR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.33-0.54). Regarding shunt failure, there was a tendency in favor of AISC use (OR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51-1.06).
CONCLUSION: Our study provided evidence that AISC is significantly associated with the reduction in the rate of bacterial ventriculoperitoneal-shunt infection. In addition, there was a tendency toward AISC to decrease shunt failure compared with the standard shunt.
METHODS: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. A meta-analysis was conducted by searching 3 databases (PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL) for relevant randomized controlled trials and observational studies. We included all studies published until November 2022 in any language. The primary outcome was the rate of bacterial infections, whereas the rate of shunt failure was our secondary endpoint. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were calculated using a random-effects model.
RESULTS: A total of 27 articles with 27 266 shunt operations were included in this study. The results indicated that using AISC is significantly associated with reduction in infections (OR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.33-0.54). Regarding shunt failure, there was a tendency in favor of AISC use (OR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51-1.06).
CONCLUSION: Our study provided evidence that AISC is significantly associated with the reduction in the rate of bacterial ventriculoperitoneal-shunt infection. In addition, there was a tendency toward AISC to decrease shunt failure compared with the standard shunt.