m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Kidney360 · 2024

Acute Kidney Injury Associated with Anticancer Therapies: Small Molecules and Targeted Therapies.

Название и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Kala J, Joseph T, Pirovano M, Fenoglio R, Cosmai L

Аннотация

Molecular targeted therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment by significantly improving patient survival compared with standard conventional chemotherapies. The use of these drugs targets specific molecules or targets, which block growth and spread of cancer cells. Many of these therapies have been approved for use with remarkable success in breast, blood, colorectal, lung, and ovarian cancers. The advantage over conventional chemotherapy is its ability to deliver drugs effectively with high specificity while being less toxic. Although known as "targeted," many of these agents lack specificity and selectivity, and they tend to inhibit multiple targets, including those in the kidneys. The side effects usually arise because of dysregulation of targets of the inhibited molecule in normal tissue. The off-target effects are caused by drug binding to unintended targets. The on-target effects are associated with inhibition toward the pathway reflecting inappropriate inhibition or activation of the intended drug target. Early detection and correct management of kidney toxicities is crucial to preserve kidney functions. The knowledge of these toxicities helps guide optimal and continued utilization of these potent therapies. This review summarizes the different types of molecular targeted therapies used in the treatment of cancer and the incidence, severity, and pattern of nephrotoxicity caused by them, with their plausible mechanism and proposed treatment recommendations.

Перевод полного текста: Перевод в очереди

Читать найденный полный текст

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Molecular targeted therapies have greatly improved survival for many types of malignancies. Unlike conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapies block the growth and spread of cancer by interfering with specific molecules involved in tumor growth and progression (Figure 1 ). The agents are classified into small molecules, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs ) , immunotherapeutic cancer vaccines, and gene therapy (Table 1 ). 1 They target growth factors, cell surface antigens, receptors/signal transduction pathways, cell cycle proteins, and modulators of apoptosis and angiogenesis, among many others (Figure 2 ).

Figure 1 Overview of the molecular targeted therapy mechanism. Molecular targeted therapy on cancer focuses on targeting specific cancer-associated molecules that are highly expre…
Figure 1 Overview of the molecular targeted therapy mechanism. Molecular targeted therapy on cancer focuses on targeting specific cancer-associated molecules that are highly expressed in cancer cells or by modulating the tumor microenvironment related to tumor vasculature, metastasis, or hypoxia. These lead to the inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, cell survival, cell cycle progression, angiogenesis, and cell invasion and metastasis. (Adapted from ref. 1 ). (Figure generated using BioRender.)

Table 1
Types of molecular targeted therapies 1
CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PARP, poly-adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Types of MoleculesMechanism/Site of ActionExamples
Small moleculesTKIsSorafenib, crizotinib
Proteasome inhibitorsCarfilzomib, bortezomib, ixazomib
CDK inhibitorsRibociclib, palbociclib
PARP inhibitorsRucaparib, olaparib, niraparib
mAbsTarget extracellular proteins interrupting interactions between the receptor and ligand, thereby inhibiting tumor growthTrastuzumab, brentuximab, adotrastuzumab-emtansine, cetuximab, bevacizumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, daratumumab
Therapeutic cancer vaccinesTarget immune-mediated antitumor responseProteins targeted by vaccines include oncoproteins, oncofetal antigens, viral proteins, hepatitis C virus
Gene therapyIntroduce genetic material DNA or RNA into cancer cells to destroy or inhibit their growthImmunotherapy, oncolytic virotherapy, targeted genomic intervention, gene editing and gene transfer
Figure 2 Molecular targets in tumor cells that act as sites of action for chemotherapy. Adapted with permission from ref. 2 . ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; BCL-2, B-cell lympho…
Figure 2 Molecular targets in tumor cells that act as sites of action for chemotherapy. Adapted with permission from ref. 2 . ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; BCL-2, B-cell lymphoma 2 gene; BCR-ABL, gene sequence; BRAF, v-Rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1; CD30, lymphocyte activation antigen; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; FGFR, fibroblast growth factor receptors; HER, human epidermal growth factor; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MMAE, monomethyl auristatin E; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin; PARP, poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. (Figure generated using BioRender.)

They, however, lack specificity and selectivity while inhibiting multiple targets. Many of the targeted pathways are expressed in kidneys. Data from phase 2 and 3 clinical trials have revealed specific toxicities involving the skin, cardiovascular system, and kidneys. 3 This is mainly due to coexpression of targets on membranes and intracellular pathways on both the tumor cells and normal cells (Figures 2 and 3 ). 3 Multitarget cancer therapies that simultaneously target multiple signaling pathways/receptors, while more efficacious, are associated with a higher incidence of off-target toxicities. 3

Figure 3 Molecular targets expressed in the kidney . Adapted with permission from ref. 2 . MET, mesenchymal–epithelial transition; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. (Figur…
Figure 3 Molecular targets expressed in the kidney . Adapted with permission from ref. 2 . MET, mesenchymal–epithelial transition; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. (Figure generated using BioRender.)

The toxicities from targeted therapies range from damage to glomeruli, tubules, interstitium, or microvasculature manifesting as asymptomatic proteinuria to kidney failure. Review of Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data (2011–2015) showed a high number of kidney adverse events with novel targeted therapies. 4 Metabolic disturbances were found in 42.2%, kidney impairment in 42.2%, and hypertension (HTN) in 10.5% of patients.

The risk of direct kidney injury of these agents is higher with concomitant use of nephrotoxic agents, intrinsic kidney disease, volume depletion, or obstructive lesions. In this review, we attempt to highlight kidney injury of some targeted chemotherapies, their mechanism of action, and proposed treatment options. Immunotherapy has not been included in this review.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors

Mechanism of Action/Current Indications

Antiangiogenic therapy targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors (VEGFR) has revolutionized the treatment of various malignancies (renal cell carcinoma [RCC], endometrial cancer, thyroid cancer, colorectal cancer).

These drugs inhibit the VEGF pathway, which play a crucial role in tumor angiogenesis, fundamental for tumor growth and metastasis. 5

Several strategies are available for inhibiting VEGF/VEGFR signaling. mAbs, such as bevacizumab, or fusion proteins, such as aflibercept, can inhibit VEGF, while fully humanized Abs, such as ramucirumab, target VEGFR, and multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mTKIs), such as sunitinib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, and axitinib, block VEGFR's intracellular tyrosine kinase activity. mTKIs are not only directed against the VEGF/VEGFR pathway but also inhibit various cellular processes involved in tumor growth and angiogenesis ( e.g ., platelet-derived growth factor receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor [FGFR], epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR], and c-mesenchymal–epithelial transition [cMET]). 5 The toxicity of targeted drugs depends on the specific target of the drug itself, and for this reason, adverse events are referred to as class effects. Inhibition of VEGF signaling causes disruption of the delicate balance of kidney microvasculature, leading to alterations in kidney endothelium and subsequent proteinuria, HTN, AKI, and CKD (Figure 4 ). 6

Figure 4 Potential mechanisms of kidney injury and HTN induced by antiangiogenic treatment. Systemic vascular endothelial cell dysfunction and localized kidney effects (glomerular…
Figure 4 Potential mechanisms of kidney injury and HTN induced by antiangiogenic treatment. Systemic vascular endothelial cell dysfunction and localized kidney effects (glomerular endothelial cells and podocytes) of antiangiogenesis drugs lead to clinical kidney syndromes. NO, nitric oxide; ET, endothelin; HTN, hypertension; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor. (Figure generated using BioRender.)

Kidney Toxicity

HTN is a frequent adverse event with an incidence ranging from 30% to 80%, depending on the specific drug, dosage, and comorbidities. Risk factors include preexisting HTN, age, and obesity. Mechanisms by which antiangiogenic agents induce HTN include microcapillary rarefaction; suppression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase; sodium retention; and increased synthesis of Endothelin 1, a potent vasoconstrictor agent. 7

The most common nephrological adverse event is proteinuria. Incidence and severity vary among studies because of patient characteristics, administered drugs, and study design (6% for cabozantinib to 27%–100% for lenvatinib). 5

The pathogenesis of proteinuria is not fully understood. Podocytes express VEGF while VEGFR is present on the surface of both glomerular capillary endothelial cells and podocytes. This VEGF-mediated interaction promotes podocyte–endothelium crosstalk, enhancing the survival, proliferation, and/or differentiation of adjacent fenestrated glomerular capillary endothelial cells. Disruption of the podocyte–endothelial–VEGF axis results in loss of endothelial fenestrations, endotheliosis, podocytes loss, and subsequent proteinuria. 5 , 8 Pathological findings often include kidney-limited thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) (Figure 5 ) in patients treated with VEGF inhibitors and minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis with mTKIs. 5 , 6

Figure 5 Kidney biopsy findings in a patient on anti-VEGF therapy: TMA. Histological examination of kidney biopsy showing TMA in a patient on anti-VEGF treatment. (A) The yellow a…
Figure 5 Kidney biopsy findings in a patient on anti-VEGF therapy: TMA. Histological examination of kidney biopsy showing TMA in a patient on anti-VEGF treatment. (A) The yellow arrow illustrates in high magnification (200 μ m) a thrombosed vessels with fibrinoid necrosis of the vessel wall in trichrome staining. (B) The yellow arrow illustrates in high magnification (200 μ m) a congested glomerulus in trichrome staining. (C) The yellow arrow illustrates in high magnification (200 pm) a preglomerular arteriole thrombotic lesion in AFOGH staining. AFOGH, acid–fuchsin orange G; TMA, thrombotic microangiopathy.

Management

Early identification, prevention, and treatment of HTN are crucial for maintaining proper drug intensity and ensuring therapeutic success. Before initiating antiangiogenic agents, managing preexisting HTN is essential and patients should undergo frequent BP monitoring. First-line therapy for antiangiogenic-induced HTN includes angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi), angiotensin II receptor blockers, β -blockers, and nondihydropyrimidine calcium channel blockers. 8

Proteinuria often is mild and asymptomatic, not requiring drug discontinuation or dose changes. The first-line treatment of mild cases of proteinuria is ACEi. The development of class-defined adverse events during treatment may correlate with improved survival. 6 , 9 Symptomatic proteinuria (edema, weight gain, and pleural effusion), nephrotic syndrome, TMA, or AKI may demand treatment interruption. In such cases, drugs can be reintroduced at reduced doses or noncontinuous schedules upon improvement in the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) grade of proteinuria. 8 Regular monitoring of kidney functions and proteinuria before initiating treatment and at each cycle is crucial. 10

FGFR Inhibitors

Mechanism of Action/Kidney Toxicity

In tumors characterized by genetic alterations in the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) pathway, use of FGFR inhibitors has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy. FGFR is a transmembrane protein present ubiquitously on the cell surface in normal tissues throughout the body. When the ligand binds to the receptor, it triggers the activation of numerous oncogenic pathways that promote cellular processes, such as proliferation, maturation, survival, differentiation, migration, and angiogenesis. 11 The FGF pathway, particularly involving the FGFR1 receptor, FGF23 ligand, and membrane Klotho in the proximal renal tubule, plays a role in phosphorus homeostasis. In normal circumstances, FGF binding its receptor inhibits sodium-phosphorus cotransporters, thus reducing kidney phosphorus reabsorption. Blocking FGFR disrupts these homeostatic mechanisms, leading to increased serum phosphorus levels. 11 Hyperphosphatemia is, therefore, a common adverse event associated with FGFR inhibitors, observed in approximately 74% of patients. 12 Such patients might have no symptoms to at most metastatic calcinosis. 13 These patients exhibit abnormal serum phosphate levels and either normal or elevated levels of calcium; elevated phosphate levels may stimulate parathyroid hormone secretion, resulting in increased serum calcium levels and potential calcinosis cutis. 14 Furthermore, some patients may develop calciphylaxis, characterized by tissue mineralization of small vessel walls due to disturbances in calcium and/or phosphate metabolism. 15

Management

Although calciphylaxis is rare, clinicians should evaluate patients' underlying risk factors and provide appropriate counseling. 13 Further studies are needed to identify more effective strategies for phosphorus control to prevent interruptions in oncological drug therapy. The initial treatment recommendation is to reduce dietary phosphorus intake. When phosphorus levels exceed ≥7 mg/dl, it becomes essential to introduce phosphate-lowering therapies, such as binders and phosphaturic agents, to prevent potential interruptions in erdafitinib treatment. In the absence of confirming data in the literature, it is reasonable to suggest replacing warfarin anticoagulants in patients who develop hyperphosphatemia to prevent the development of calciphylaxis. Despite existing strategies, reducing the dose of erdafitinib is often necessary for effective management of phosphorus levels. 16

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (cMET, EGFR, and Fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase)

Mechanism of Action/Kidney Toxicity

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are used in the treatment of several types of cancers, including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), non–small cell lung cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and RCC. Toxicity is dependent on the target of the TKI. In a phase 1 dose escalation study, cMET drugs were shown to cause obstructive nephropathy, crystal nephropathy, and formation of insoluble metabolites. 17 Interruptions in the regulation of EGFR lead to several malignancies of the head/neck, breast, pancreas, and lung. Small molecule TKIs, such as erlotinib, gefitinib, brigatinib, icotinib, and afatinib, are known to cause a wide range of nephrotoxicity from IgA nephropathy to tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) (Table 2 ).

Table 2
Kidney toxicities, treatment options, and dose changes for molecular targeted therapies
ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; AIN, acute interstitial nephritis; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; ATN, acute tubular necrosis; BCL-2, B-cell lymphoma 2; BCR-ABL, gene sequence; BID, twice daily; BRAF, v-Rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1; BTK, Bruton’s tyrosine kinase; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; cMET, c-mesenchymal–epithelial transition; CR, complete remission; CrCl, creatinine clearance; CTCAE, Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IFN, interferon; IL-2, interleukin-2; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin; PARP, poly-adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase; PI, proteosome inhibitor; SIAD, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; TLS, tumor lysis syndrome; TMA, thrombotic microangiopathy; unk, unknown; XPO inhibitor, exportin-1 inhibitor.

TargetAgentPharmacokinetics 18 t 1/2 /Renal Metabolism/ClearanceKidney ToxicityTreatmentDose ChangeReferences
BCL-2 inhibitorVenetoclax19–26 h/none/hepaticTLS AKIHydration AllopurinolSlow escalation of doseSee details in text
Epigenetic inhibitorsBelinostat Panobinostat Vorinostat Romidepsin Decitabine Azacitidine Ivosidenib Enasidenib1.1 h/40%/hepatic 30 h/2%/unk 2 h/<1%/unk 3 h/unk/8.4 L/h 0.62 h/<1%/125 ml/h per m 2 41 min/<1%/167 L/h 58 h/17%/5.6 L/h 7.9 d/11%/0.70 L/hAKI Hemorrhagic cystitis azotemia Collapsing glomerulopathy TMA Renal tubular acidosis Salt wasting Differentiation syndrome Pseudo-AKICessation of therapy Supportive care High dose steroids for collapsing GN Fluid/electrolyte replacementDose resumed after toxicity resolvesSee details in text
PIsBortezomib Carfilzomib Ixazomib40–193 h/unk/102–112 L/h <1 h/unk/151–263 L/h 9.5 d/62%/unkTMA, AIN TMA, prerenal, TLS, ATN None reported? plasmapheresis ? eculizumab in reports: Insufficient dataReduce dose by 25% if GFR <20 ml/min19
PARP inhibitorOlaparib Niraparib Talazoparib6.10 h/44%/4.55 L/h 36 h/47%/16.2 L/h 90 h/68.7%/6.45 L/hIncreases in creatinine Pseudo-AKICheck cystatin-C to confirm pseudo-AKIDose reduction to 200 mg BID for CrCl 31–50 ml/min20
Biological agentIFNUnk/unk/9.4–28.9 ml/minProteinuria Minimal change disease TMA ATNDiscontinueNone21 , 22
Biological agentIL-2unkCapillary leak syndrome AKI Hypovolemia/prerenalCessation of therapy Supportive treatmentAvoid in older/CKD/concomitant nephrotoxins/risk of prerenal azotemia23 , 24
XPO 1 inhibitorSelinexor6–8 h/unk/17.9 L/hHyponatremia prerenal, Hypovolemia SIADIV fluids d/c antiemetics/antidepressants/diuretics Salt tabletsDiscontinuation Medication25
Bruton TKIIbrutinib4–6 h/7.8%/112–159 ml/minAKI TLSHydration Monitor kidney functionsNone26
CD22-directed cytotoxinMoxetumomab1.4 h/approximately 100%/25 L/hAKI ProteinuriaMonitor kidney functionsDelay new cycle if CTCAE grade 3 AKI27
CD30-directed antibodyBrentuximab4–6 d/unk/unkWorsens already present kidney impairmentStop drug and go for HSCT if CRAvoid if CrCl <30 ml/min28
ALK/cMETImatinib Sunitinib Ceritinib Crizotinib Alectinib Brigatinib Capmatinib18–40 h/13%/8–14 L/h 40–110 h/16%/34–62 L/h 41 h/1.3%/33–88 L/h 42 h/2.3%/60–100 L/h 33 h/0.5%/82 L/h 25 h/86%/12.7 L/h 6.5 h/22%/24 L/hAcquired Fanconi syndrome Hypophosphatemia ATN Interstitial mononuclear cell infiltration including eosinophils TMA Kidney cysts (new and progression of preexisting cysts) hematuria Prerenal Pseudo-AKIElectrolyte repletion Regular imaging of kidney cysts Drainage of cysts when required Check cystatin-C to confirm pseudo-AKI 29Discontinuation of treatment If CrCl <30, reduce dose of crizotinib to 250 daily from BID Electrolyte repletion Regular imaging of kidney cysts Drainage of cysts when required30 – 36
EGFRAfatinib Erlotinib Gefitinib Brigatinib Icotinib Osimertinib37 h/4.3%/1530 ml/min 36.2 h/8%/unk 48 h/<4%/595 ml/min 25 h/25%/12.7 L/h 5.5 h/9%/13.3±4.78 L/h 48 h/14%/14.3 L/hMinimal change disease IgA nephropathy Crescent formation Tubular injury Immune-complex GN ATN TLSHolding drug ImmunosuppressionNo dose changes needed37 , 38
BCR-ABLImatinib Dasitinib18–40 h/13%/14 L/h 3–5 h/4%/363.8 L/hATN TLS Proximal tubulopathy Fanconi syndrome Hypophosphatemia ProteinuriaDiscontinuation Switching to alternate TKINo dose adjustment39 – 43
BTKIbrutinib4–6 h/7.8%/112–159 ml/minInterstitial nephritisEarly detection GlucocorticoidsDiscontinuation44
BRAF/MEK/CDK4/6Vemurafenib Dabrafenib Ribociclib Palbociclib Abemaciclib57 h/1%/31 L/d 10 h/23%/34.4 L/h 32.6 h/unk/unk 29 h/17.5%/63.1 L/h 18.3 h/3%/26 L/hATN Interstitial fibrosis Interstitial nephritis Peripheral eosinophilia Proteinuria Hyponatremia Hypokalemia Pseudo AKIDiscontinuation of drugDiscontinuation of drug until grade 0/1, then 25% reduced dose No changes with pretreatment CrCl <30 ml/min except for ribociclib (reduce to 200 mg daily)45 – 47
mTOREverolimus Temsirolimus30 h/5%/unk 17.3 h/4.6%/16.2 L/hATNMonitoring of proteinuria Addition of ACE/ARB Discontinuation of drugHolding treatment until resolution Discontinuation permanently with CTCAE grade 4 proteinuria or AKI48 , 49

Gilteritinib, an Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitor, used in the treatment of refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia can cause AKI (14%) through prerenal injury due to diarrhea. 50 Other clinical features include cytopenia and transaminitis. One case was reported of CTCAE grade 4 toxicity requiring temporary hemodialysis. 50

Advanced non–small cell lung cancer treated with crizotinib and ceritinib cause complex kidney cysts (in 4%), prerenal injury, and electrolyte abnormalities (Table 2 ). With ceritinib, hypophosphatemia was seen with 10% of patients, hypomagnesemia in 8%, and elevation in creatinine in 11%. Pseudo-AKI has been reported with some TKIs, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors and mesenchymal–epithelial transition inhibitors 30 , 31 (Table 2 ).

The renal transporters that constitute the tubular creatinine secretion pathway are OCT2/OCT3/OATP2 at the basolateral and MATE-1/MATE-2k at the luminal surface of tubular epithelial cells. Other than creatinine, these renal transporters have other substrates that are pharmacologic agents, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors. This interference with the creatinine tubular secretion pathway can cause false rise in serum creatinine (SCr) level and reduction in eGFR, which can be interpreted falsely as AKI (pseudo-AKI). 29 Alternative filtration markers, such as cystatin-C, can be used to noninvasively unmask a pseudo-AKI associated with these agents. Ideal filtration markers that exhibit very accurate measurements of GFR and can differentiate between true AKI and pseudo-AKI would be the use of exogenous filtration markers, such as radionuclides ( 51 Cr-EDTA, 99m Tc-DTPA) and contrast agents (iothalamate, iohexol). These modalities are not readily available in many centers. 29

Management

AKI was seen in patients receiving higher, daily doses of cMET agents. Treatment required dose reduction, temporarily holding the drug, or immunosuppression. 51 With crizotinib, because 22% is excreted in urine, the dose should be reduced to 250 mg daily from twice daily in patients with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min with rapid kidney recovery seen after discontinuation. 52 For events associated with ceritinib, recommendations include regular monitoring of electrolytes and kidney function. 48 While some kidney cysts required percutaneous drainage, close monitoring is recommended for most. 48

Nonreceptor TKIs (Gene Sequence, Bruton’s TKI, Janus Kinase)

Mechanism of Action/Kidney Toxicity

Kidney toxicities of gene sequence TKIs seem to be drug specific. Imatinib is currently used for gastrointestinal stromal tumors and CML. 48 Degree of change in eGFR seems to be related to the duration of treatment. 39 Imatinib can cause TLS, Fanconi syndrome, and proximal tubular dysfunction and toxic tubular damage by inhibiting platelet-derived growth factor receptor, which plays a role in tubular regeneration after acute tubular necrosis (ATN). 39 In a study conducted in 100 patients with CML treated with imatinib, 7% experienced AKI and 12% developed CKD. 53 Hypophosphatemia was seen in 10% patients in one case series because of low vitamin D 25-hydroxy and hypocalcemia. 54 , 55 Imatinib-resistant CML can be treated with dasatinib, a second-generation TKI with only three published case reports of AKI. 56 – 58 After 11 months of therapy, some patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with 400 mg/d of imatinib and patients with CML treated with dasatinib at a dose of 100 mg/d experienced SIAD-induced hyponatremia. 59 Ibrutinib is a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor used mainly in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and Mantle cell lymphoma can cause nonoliguric AKI and proteinuria through acute interstitial nephritis (AIN). 44 , 60

Ruxolitinib, tofacitinib, and baricitinib comprise the Janus kinase inhibitors used in the treatment of chronic hematopoietic neoplasms. Although liver toxicities have been reported, no kidney toxicities have been reported. 61

Management

Current strategies include discontinuation, reducing dose, or switching to an alternate TKI. 62 Early detection is crucial and includes discontinuation of the drug and administration of glucocorticoids when warranted. No dose adjustments have been required for Janus kinase inhibitors.

Serine/Threonine Kinase Inhibitor (v-Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B1/Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6, and Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin)

Mechanism of Action/Kidney Toxicity

Malignancies that are caused by v-Rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) mutations, such as metastatic melanoma, can potentially be treated with BRAF inhibitors, such as vemurafenib and dabrafenib. Vemurafenib can cause AKI, proteinuria, rash, and peripheral hypereosinophilia. Vemurafenib decreased GFR by 20%–74% in a case series of eight patients. Patients with risk factors of developing kidney toxicities are those with the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, HTN, diabetes mellitus, CKD, recent use of contrast agents, or recent use of nephrotoxic standard chemotherapy. 45 The fact that V600 mutation that BRAF inhibitors treat is more commonly noted in men could explain male predominance. 45 In a 1-year data from FAERS, 13 cases of AKI were reported with dabrafenib. 63 In general, this drug has been shown to be less kidney toxic. Interstitial nephritis manifests during the first couple of weeks, and tubular toxicity has been seen with longer treatment durations. 45

Ribociclib belongs to the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 family and can cause AKI in nearly 60% of patients as per FAERS data. 46 Of the six patients biopsied in a study by Gupta et al. , most had ATN and one had AIN. 46 Early trials of palbociclib and ribociclib did not describe the incidence of AKI, whereas clinical trials of abemaciclib have reported that up to 25% of patients experienced a potentially reversible rise in SCr without actually changing GFR. 46 At therapeutic concentrations, abemaciclib and its major circulating metabolites would inhibit OCT2 and MATE1/2-K clinically, resulting in elevations in SCr are a result of inhibition of active tubular secretion of creatinine and not a reduction in kidney function (pseudo-AKI). 64

Everolimus and temsirolimus are two mechanistic target of rapamycin agents that are used in the treatment of RCC, refractory hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, and lymphomas. Kidney toxicities include proteinuria and AKI in patients with CKD through ATN, disruption of the VEGF pathway, inhibition of HIF-alpha, decreased uptake of albumin in proximal tubules, and increased glomerular macrophages. Fifty-seven percent patients had worsening creatinine levels with temsirolimus. 65 Patients with RCC who had impaired kidney functions were at higher risk of AKI. Both drugs can cause different degrees of hyponatremia through aldosterone resistance. 66 , 67 Temsirolimus can also cause phosphate wasting through ATN. 68

Management

Although kidney function improves in some patients despite continuation of therapy with BRAF inhibitors, in general, the drug should be discontinued. Patients have recovery of kidney function with discontinuation of ribociclib. 69 For grade 3 CTCAE toxicity, treatment methods include holding the drug, discontinuation of the drug with CTCAE grade 4 proteinuria/AKI, and addition of ACEi/angiotensin II receptor blocker for proteinuria. 48

B-Cell Lymphoma 2 Inhibitors (Venetoclax)

Mechanism of Action/Kidney Toxicity

Venetoclax, an oral highly selective inhibitor of the B-cell lymphoma 2 family, was approved for the treatment of CLL and acute myeloid leukemia and off-label use for relapsed/refractory Mantle cell lymphoma. Venetoclax has been associated with a high incidence of TLS, causing AKI and severe electrolyte abnormalities. The incidence was found to be 10%–18% in early phase 1 studies. 70 Risk is higher if either started at a very high dose or the dose is escalated too quickly in patients with moderate/large tumor burden or relapsed/refractory CLL.

Management

TLS prophylaxis is performed by slow dose escalation starting at 20 mg daily and gradually increasing to finally a dose of 400 mg over 5 weeks. 71 Avoiding concurrent start of anti-CD20 mAbs is required. If needed, obinutuzumab is started before, and rituximab is started after venetoclax. Regular monitoring of TLS laboratory test results is needed, and those at risk should be started on hypouricemic medications and hydration 2–3 days before the start of therapy. Patients relapsing after B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor treatment frequently have proliferative disease, requiring a faster time to target dose than this scheme allows, and need rapid dose escalation (RDE). Analysis of 33 patients with CLL who underwent venetoclax RDE after prior B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor treatment showed that 52% developed laboratory TLS and 15% developed clinical TLS, all because of kidney injury. TLS was seen in more patients with a higher initial tumor burden.

Epigenetic Inhibitors (Azacitidine, Decitabine, Belinostat, Panobinostat, Vorinostat, Romidepsin, Ivosidenib, and Enasidenib)

Mechanism of Action/Kidney Toxicity

Epigenetic inhibitors, such as DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis), have been well established in treating hematological malignancies. They are known to induce cell and compound-specific nephrotoxicity. 72 5-Azacytidine induces kidney tubular acidosis in patients with advanced acute leukemia. 73 HDACis induce apoptosis in renal tubular cells. 74 DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and HDACis cause increased nephrotoxicity by inducing increased oxidative stress. These studies have determined the cytotoxicity of the epigenetic inhibitors alone and in combination with various chemotherapeutics on prostate cancer and kidney cells. 72 Decitabine-induced TMA has been reported. 75 Nephrotoxicity of decitabine is mild, rare, and dose dependent. In phase 2 clinical trials, decitabine can lead to direct injury to the endothelium. 75 Clinical trials with decitabine-associated AKI revealed one patient recovered kidney functions within a week of drug withdrawal. Another patient had worsening kidney functions with a second course, late recovery with withdrawal, and finally biopsy-proven AIN. 76 In a study of 22 patients receiving 33 courses of 5-azacytidine, during 29 courses (88%) of treatment, polyuria, glucosuria, and changes in bicarbonate or phosphorus levels were detected. Polyuria, salt wasting, and orthostatic hypotension occurred in 21% of treatment courses. These results suggested proximal and distal tubular damage. 73 Possible inhibition of creatinine transporters in proximal tubular cells by azacytidine without affecting kidney functions has been reported as well. 77

A novel class of epigenetic drugs, so-called mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 inhibitor (mIDHi), has been developed. Two mIDHis, ivosidenib and enasidenib, have been approved, and several other mIDHis are being tested in preclinical and clinical trials. Enasidenib was approved for use in refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Data from multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 study identified 11.7% as having isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS). Of the 33 patients, 14 had AKI. The onset of symptoms ranged from 7 days to 5 months. 78 In another study of IDH-DS, induced AKI was seen in 17%–24% of patients. 79

Management

Drug therapy cessation is required in those with AKI. In those with tubular dysfunction, intensive fluid and electrolyte replacements were part of treatment. Romidepsin-induced collapsing glomerulonephritis was treated with high-dose steroids after cessation of drug therapy. In patients with IDH-DS, enasidenib was stopped; they were treated with dexamethasone and hydroxyurea for co-occurring leukocytosis and treated for TLS.

Proteosome Inhibitors (Bortezomib, Carfilzomib, and Ixazomib)

Mechanism of Action/Kidney Toxicity

Proteosomes inhibit the ubiquitin–proteosome system regulating the growth of normal and tumor cells. Malignant cells are more sensitive to proteosome inhibitors (PIs) than normal cells. 80 Bortezomib has been known to cause TMA in several case reports and AIN with granuloma formation ( e.g ., Figure 6 ). 80 The decrease in NF-κB levels in the nucleus leads to decreased VEGF production potentially predisposing to TMA. 81 In a study of 276 patients with multiple myeloma (MM), development of AKI after treatment with bortezomib was observed in the absence of TLS. 82 Multivariant analysis revealed that lower baseline GFR, lower albumin levels, concomitant amyloidosis, and use of acyclovir during bortezomib treatment were independently associated with higher risk of AKI. Carfilzomib, which was approved for refractory MM, was found to cause AKI in 25% of patients in a phase 2 study. There have been reports of TMA, TLS, and ATN as well. The onset of TMA could range from 2 days to 17 months. It has been proposed that the early-onset TMA is an immune-mediated and the late onset a dose-dependent toxic mechanism and that plasmapheresis is unlikely to show benefit. Ixazomib has been approved for newly diagnosed and refractory MM. No known kidney toxicities have been reported. 83 Information from the FOCUS trial reported several more cases of HTN and TMA reported with carfilzomib than bortezomib. 80

Figure 6 Kidney biopsy findings in a patient on PI: acute granulomatous tubule-interstitial nephritis. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; PAS, periodic acid–Schiff; PI, proteosome inhibi…
Figure 6 Kidney biopsy findings in a patient on PI: acute granulomatous tubule-interstitial nephritis. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; PAS, periodic acid–Schiff; PI, proteosome inhibitor.

Management

Bortezomib-induced AIN is treated by discontinuation of the offending agent, initiation of steroids, and rarely requiring cyclophosphamide, as reported by Cheungpasitporn et al. 84 TMA is treated with discontinuation of the offending drug and supportive care. Plasmapheresis has not shown to have any clinical benefit. 81 Of the 11 patients described by Yui et al. , four patients were treated with plasma exchange, and three patients received eculizumab. Three patients died within 30 days of TMA diagnosis. Nine patients had resolution of TMA without evidence of hemolysis after withdrawal of PI. Two patients had stabilization of laboratory values but persistent evidence of hemolysis despite medication withdrawal. One patient had recurrence of TMA with rechallenge of PI. 83

Poly-Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose Polymerase Inhibitors (Olaparib)

Inhibitors of poly-adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase are approved for the treatment of breast cancer gene (BRCA)-mutated breast cancer and platinum-sensitive relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer and for maintenance therapy for pancreatic cancer with BRCA-1 or BRCA-2 mutation. See Table 2 for toxicities and treatment. 20

Other Agents

Brentuximab, ibrutinib, moxetumomab, selinexor, IFNs, and IL 2 are summarized in Table 2 . 21 – 28

Conclusion

New anticancer medications are rapidly evolving, offering patients with previously resistant cancers the promise of more effective therapies capable of extending their lives. However, adverse kidney consequences develop in treated patients with underlying risk factors, requiring the nephrology community to be familiar with their nephrotoxic effects. Through multidisciplinary and collaborative efforts between oncology and nephrology, the promise of cancer treatments can be realized while minimizing kidney‐related complications that have both short‐term and long‐term consequences.

Disclosures

Disclosure forms, as provided by each author, are available with the online version of the article at http://links.lww.com/KN9/A656 .

Funding

None.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Jaya Kala.

Resources: Roberta Fenoglio, Jaya Kala.

Supervision: Jaya Kala.

Writing – original draft: Laura Cosmai, Teresa Joseph, Jaya Kala, Marta Pirovano.

Writing – review & editing: Laura Cosmai, Teresa Joseph, Jaya Kala, Marta Pirovano.

References

1. Lee YT, Tan YJ, Oon CE. Molecular targeted therapy: treating cancer with specificity. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018;834:188–196. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.07.034

2. Kala J, Salman LA, Geara AS, Izzedine H. Nephrotoxicity from molecularly targeted chemotherapeutic agents. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2021;28(5):415–428.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2021.09.003

3. Kelly RJ, Billemont B, Rixe O. Renal toxicity of targeted therapies. Target Oncol. 2009;4(2):121–133. doi: 10.1007/s11523-009-0109-x

4. Jhaveri KD, Wanchoo R, Sakhiya V, Ross DW, Fishbane S. Adverse renal effects of novel molecular oncologic targeted therapies: a narrative review. Kidney Int Rep. 2017;2(1):108–123. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2016.09.055

5. Van Wynsberghe M Flejeo J Sakhi H, et al. Nephrotoxicity of anti-angiogenic therapies. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(4):640. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040640

6. Izzedine H, Massard C, Spano JP, Goldwasser F, Khayat D, Soria JC. VEGF signalling inhibition-induced proteinuria: mechanisms, significance and management. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(2):439–448. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.11.001

7. Porta C, Cosmai L, Gallieni M, Pedrazzoli P, Malberti F. Renal effects of targeted anticancer therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015;11(6):354–370. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.15

8. Tucci M Cosmai L Pirovano M, et al. How to deal with renal toxicities from immune-based combination treatments in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A nephrological consultation for Oncologists. Cancer Treat Rev. 2024;125:102692. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102692

9. Rashidi A, Wanchoo R, Izzedine H. How I manage hypertension and proteinuria associated with VEGF inhibitor. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023;18(1):121–123. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05610522

10. Izzedine H Escudier B Lhomme C, et al. Kidney diseases associated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF): an 8-year observational study at a single center. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93(24):333–339. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000207

11. Franza A, Pirovano M, Giannatempo P, Cosmai L. Erdafitinib in locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma with certain FGFR genetic alterations. Future Oncol. 2022;18(19):2455–2464. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-1151

12. Nishina T, Takahashi S, Iwasawa R, Noguchi H, Aoki M, Doi T. Safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamics of erdafitinib, a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2018;36(3):424–434. doi: 10.1007/s10637-017-0514-4

13. Lacouture ME Sibaud V Anadkat MJ, et al. Dermatologic adverse events associated with selective fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors: Overview, prevention, and management guidelines. Oncologist. 2021;26(2):e316–e326. doi: 10.1002/onco.13552

14. Arudra K Patel R Tetzlaff MT, et al. Calcinosis cutis dermatologic toxicity associated with fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor for the treatment of Wilms tumor. J Cutan Pathol. 2018;45(10):786–790. doi: 10.1111/cup.13319

15. Macklis P, Chung C, Kaffenberger B. Calciphylaxis associated with the fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor erdafitinib. JAAD Case Rep. 2021;7:125–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2020.11.022

16. Kommalapati A, Tella SH, Borad M, Javle M, Mahipal A. FGFR inhibitors in oncology: insight on the management of toxicities in clinical practice. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(12):2968. doi: 10.3390/cancers13122968

17. Lolkema MP Bohets HH Arkenau HT, et al. The c-Met tyrosine kinase inhibitor JNJ-38877605 causes renal toxicity through species-specific insoluble metabolite formation. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(10):2297–2304. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3258

18. Pantziarka P, Capistrano I R, De Potter A, Vandeborne L, Bouche G. An open access database of licensed cancer drugs. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:627574. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.627574

19. Dimopoulos MA Sonneveld P Leung N, et al. International myeloma working group recommendations for the diagnosis and management of myeloma-related renal impairment. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(13):1544–1557. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.0044

20. Dean E Middleton MR Pwint T, et al. Phase I study to assess the safety and tolerability of olaparib in combination with bevacizumab in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(3):468–474. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.555

21. Markowitz GS, Nasr SH, Stokes MB, D'Agati VD. Treatment with IFN-{alpha}, -{beta}, or -{gamma} is associated with collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(4):607–615. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07311009

22. Ault BH, Stapleton FB, Gaber L, Martin A, Roy S, III, Murphy SB. Acute renal failure during therapy with recombinant human gamma interferon. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(21):1397–1400. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198811243192107

23. Belldegrun A Webb DE Austin HA III, et al. Effects of interleukin-2 on renal function in patients receiving immunotherapy for advanced cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106(6):817–822. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-6-817

24. Guleria AS Yang JC Topalian SL, et al. Renal dysfunction associated with the administration of high-dose interleukin-2 in 199 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma or renal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12(12):2714–2722. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.12.2714

25. Kala J, Mamlouk O, Jhaveri KD. Selinexor-associated hyponatremia: single-center, real-world data. Kidney Int. 2020;98(3):789–791. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.06.007

26. Wang ML Rule S Martin P, et al. Targeting BTK with ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(6):507–516. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1306220

27. Kreitman RJ Dearden C Zinzani PL, et al. Moxetumomab pasudotox in relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia. Leukemia. 2018;32(8):1768–1777. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0210-1

28. Dumont M Ram-Wolff C Roelens M, et al. Efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine in advanced-stage primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(6):1315–1317. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18215

29. Vanhoutte T, Sprangers B. Pseudo-AKI associated with targeted anti-cancer agents-the truth is in the eye of the filtration marker. Clin Kidney J. 2023;16(4):603–610. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad011

30. Arakawa H, Omote S, Tamai I. Inhibitory effect of crizotinib on creatinine uptake by renal secretory transporter OCT2. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106(9):2899–2903. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.03.013

31. Mohan A, Herrmann SM. Capmatinib-induced pseudo-acute kidney injury: a case report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2022;79(1):120–124. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.04.009

32. Verzicco I Regolisti G Quaini F, et al. Electrolyte disorders induced by antineoplastic drugs. Front Oncol. 2020;10:779. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00779

33. Izzedine H, El-Fekih RK, Perazella MA. The renal effects of ALK inhibitors. Invest New Drugs. 2016;34(5):643–649. doi: 10.1007/s10637-016-0379-y

34. Gastaud L Ambrosetti D Otto J, et al. Acute kidney injury following crizotinib administration for non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Lung Cancer. 2013;82(2):362–364. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.08.007

35. Ramachandran P, Morcus R, Tahir M, Onukogu I, Spinowitz B, Wang JC. Alectinib (Alecensa)-induced reversible grade IV nephrotoxicity: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2018;12(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s13256-018-1849-y

36. Wang Y Wang T Xue J, et al. Fatal tumour lysis syndrome induced by brigatinib in a lung adenocarcinoma patient treated with sequential ALK inhibitors: a case report. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:809467. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.809467

37. Niitsu T Hayashi T Uchida J, et al. Drug-induced kidney injury caused by osimertinib: report of a rare case. Nephron. 2022;146(1):58–63. doi: 10.1159/000518774

38. Vishwanathan K Sanchez-Simon I Keam B, et al. A multicenter, phase I, pharmacokinetic study of osimertinib in cancer patients with normal renal function or severe renal impairment. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020;8(4):e00613. doi: 10.1002/prp2.613

39. Yilmaz M Lahoti A O'Brien S, et al. Estimated glomerular filtration rate changes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer. 2015;121(21):3894–3904. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29587

40. François H, Coppo P, Hayman JP, Fouqueray B, Mougenot B, Ronco P. Partial fanconi syndrome induced by imatinib therapy: a novel cause of urinary phosphate loss. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51(2):298–301. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.10.039

41. Foringer JR, Verani RR, Tjia VM, Finkel KW, Samuels JA, Guntupalli JS. Acute renal failure secondary to imatinib mesylate treatment in prostate cancer. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(12):2136–2138. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G131

42. Pou M Saval N Vera M, et al. Acute renal failure secondary to imatinib mesylate treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2003;44(7):1239–1241. doi: 10.1080/1042819031000079140

43. Gafter-Gvili A Herman M Ori Y, et al. Inhibition of mitochondrial function reduces DNA repair in human mononuclear cells. Leuk Res. 2011;35(2):219–225. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2010.06.009

44. Markoth C, File I, Szasz R, Bidiga L, Balla J, Matyus J. Ibrutinib-induced acute kidney injury via interstitial nephritis. Ren Fail. 2021;43(1):335–339. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1874985

45. Wanchoo R, Devoe C, Jhaveri KD. BRAF inhibitors - do we need to worry about kidney injury? Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15(5):579–581. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2016.1164139

46. Gupta S, Caza T, Herrmann SM, Sakhiya VC, Jhaveri KD. Clinicopathologic features of acute kidney injury associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Kidney Int Rep. 2022;7(3):618–623. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.11.033

47. Krens SD Lassche G Jansman FGA, et al. Dose recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(4):e200–e207. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30145-7

48. Abbas A, Mirza MM, Ganti AK, Tendulkar K. Renal toxicities of targeted therapies. Target Oncol. 2015;10(4):487–499. doi: 10.1007/s11523-015-0368-7

49. Mielczarek L, Brodziak A, Sobczuk P, Kawecki M, Cudnoch-Jedrzejewska A, Czarnecka AM. Renal toxicity of targeted therapies for renal cell carcinoma in patients with normal and impaired kidney function. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021;87(6):723–742. doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04260-y

50. Shimazu Y, Ucikawa M, Furuichi M, Nohgawa M. Acute kidney injury possibly due to the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib in a patient with refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a case report. SN Compr Clin Med. 2022;4(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s42399-022-01202-4

51. Infante JR Rugg T Gordon M, et al. Unexpected renal toxicity associated with SGX523, a small molecule inhibitor of MET. Invest New Drugs. 2013;31(2):363–369. doi: 10.1007/s10637-012-9823-9

52. Camidge DR Bang YJ Kwak EL, et al. Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(10):1011–1019. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70344-3

53. Marcolino MS Boersma E Clementino NCD, et al. Imatinib treatment duration is related to decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(9):2073–2079. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq715

54. Owen S, Hatfield A, Letvak L. Imatinib and Altered Bone and Mineral Metabolism. New Engl J Med. 2006;355(6):627–629. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc061565

55. Berman E Nicolaides M Maki RG, et al. Altered bone and mineral metabolism in patients receiving imatinib mesylate. New Engl J Med. 2006;354(19):2006–2013. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051140

56. Holstein SA, Stokes JB, Hohl RJ. Renal failure and recovery associated with second-generation Bcr-Abl kinase inhibitors in imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia. Leuk Res. 2009;33(2):344–347. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2008.07.029

57. Kaiafa G Kakaletsis N Savopoulos C, et al. Simultaneous manifestation of pleural effusion and acute renal failure associated with dasatinib: a case report. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014;39(1):102–105. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12107

58. Ozkurt S, Temiz G, Acikalin MF, Soydan M. Acute renal failure under dasatinib therapy. Ren Fail. 2010;32(1):147–149. doi: 10.3109/08860220903391226

59. Liapis K, Apostolidis J, Charitaki E, Panitsas F, Harhalakis N, Nikiforakis E. Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone associated with imatinib. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42(12):1882–1886. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L410

60. Davids MS, Brown JR. Ibrutinib: a first in class covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase. Future Oncol. 2014;10(6):957–967. doi: 10.2217/fon.14.51

61. Hoisnard L Lebrun-Vignes B Maury S, et al. Adverse events associated with JAK inhibitors in 126,815 reports from the WHO pharmacovigilance database. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):7140. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10777-w

62. Piscitani L, Sirolli V, Di Liberato L, Morroni M, Bonomini M. Nephrotoxicity associated with novel anticancer agents (aflibercept, dasatinib, nivolumab): case series and nephrological considerations. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(14):4878. doi: 10.3390/ijms21144878

63. Jhaveri KD, Sakhiya V, Fishbane S. Nephrotoxicity of the BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(8):1133–1134. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1713

64. Chappell JC Turner PK Pak YA, et al. Abemaciclib inhibits renal tubular secretion without changing glomerular filtration rate. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105(5):1187–1195. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1296

65. Kwitkowski VE Prowell TM Ibrahim A, et al. FDA approval summary: temsirolimus as treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Oncologist. 2010;15(4):428–435. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0178

66. Yeo W Chan SL Mo FK, et al. Phase I/II study of temsirolimus for patients with unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)- a correlative study to explore potential biomarkers for response. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:395. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1334-6

67. Saba NF Hurwitz SJ Magliocca K, et al. Phase 1 and pharmacokinetic study of everolimus in combination with cetuximab and carboplatin for recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 2014;120(24):3940–3951. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28965

68. Liamis G, Filippatos TD, Elisaf MS. Electrolyte disorders associated with the use of anticancer drugs. Eur J Pharmacol. 2016;777:78–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.02.064

69. Gulturk I, Yilmaz M, Ozmen A, Tacar SY, Erdal GS, Tural D. Ribociclib induced acute kidney injury: a case report. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2021;27(8):2023–2026. doi: 10.1177/10781552211007202

70. Gentile M Petrungaro A Uccello G, et al. Venetoclax for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2017;26(11):1307–1316. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2017.1386173

71. Davids MS Hallek M Wierda W, et al. Comprehensive safety analysis of venetoclax monotherapy for patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(18):4371–4379. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3761

72. Scholpa NE, Kolli RT, Moore M, Arnold RD, Glenn TC, Cummings BS. Nephrotoxicity of epigenetic inhibitors used for the treatment of cancer. Chem Biol Interact. 2016;258:21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2016.08.010

73. Peterson BA, Collins AJ, Vogelzang NJ, Bloomfield CD. 5-Azacytidine and renal tubular dysfunction. Blood. 1981;57(1):182–185. doi: 10.1182/blood.v57.1.182.182

74. Dong G, Wang L, Wang CY, Yang T, Kumar MV, Dong Z. Induction of apoptosis in renal tubular cells by histone deacetylase inhibitors, a family of anticancer agents. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;325(3):978–984. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.137398

75. Qin AB, Tan Y, Su T. Decitabine-induced kidney thrombotic microangiopathy with glomerular crescents formation and tubular necrosis: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(43):e22901. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022901

76. van Groeningen CJ, Leyva A, O'Brien AM, Gall HE, Pinedo HM. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (NSC 127716) in cancer patients. Cancer Res. 1986;46(9):4831–4836. PMID: 2425959

77. Kallis C, Luger S, Hogan J, Geara AS. Fluctuating creatinine with azacitidine administration. Clin Nephrol. 2021;95(5):284–285. doi: 10.5414/CN110398

78. Fathi AT DiNardo CD Kline I, et al.; AG221-C-001 Study Investigators. Differentiation syndrome associated with enasidenib, a selective inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 2: analysis of a phase 1/2 study. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(8):1106–1110. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4695

79. Norsworthy KJ Mulkey F Scott EC, et al. Differentiation syndrome with ivosidenib and enasidenib treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory IDH-mutated AML: a U.S. Food and drug administration systematic analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(16):4280–4288. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0834

80. Wanchoo R Abudayyeh A Doshi M, et al. Renal toxicities of novel agents used for treatment of multiple myeloma. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(1):176–189. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06100616

81. Lodhi A, Kumar A, Saqlain MU, Suneja M. Thrombotic microangiopathy associated with proteasome inhibitors. Clin Kidney J. 2015;8(5):632–636. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv059

82. Song SM Jeon J Jang HR, et al. Acute kidney injury in bortezomib-treated patients with multiple myeloma. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023;38(9):2077–2085. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfad016

83. Yui JC Van Keer J Weiss BM, et al. Proteasome inhibitor associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Am J Hematol. 2016;91(9):E348–E352. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24447

84. Cheungpasitporn W Leung N Rajkumar SV, et al. Bortezomib-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30(7):1225–1229. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv222

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты