[Overview and Introduction of a Treatment Concept for Postoperative Care and Mobilisation After Free Flap Transplantation in the Lower Extremity].

Introduction: Free flap transplants for soft tissue reconstruction in the lower extremity are associated with a higher rate of complications compared with other areas. Mobilisation and the resulting hydrostatic pressure put strain on the flaps. In general, these effects are countered by slowly increasing hydrostatic pressure with the leg being compressed by elastic bandages. These postoperative regimes are also called dangling procedures or "flap training", but are not scientifically validated and therefore there is no consensus or guideline leading to a standard treatment regime. The goal of our study was to present an overview of currently performed regimes. Material and Methods: We conducted an email survey by sending a questionnaire to departments for plastic and reconstructive surgery in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, which perform free flap transplantations in the lower extremity. The questionnaire ascertained the starting point and the frequency of the dangling procedures, the introduction of weight-bearing on the operated extremity and the incidence of complications occurring during mobilisation. Results: We included 32 departments and compared them by the number of free flap transplantations performed per year. We found a wide variation between the postoperative treatment regimes. In most departments, flap training is started between the 3rd and 7th day after surgery and lasts between 5 and 15 min. The intervals with which flap training intensity is increased are inhomogeneous as well. The time until full weight-bearing is exerted on the operated extremity ranges from day 5 to week 3 postoperatively. Complications due to flap training were reported by one third of the participating departments. Conclusion: Elastic compression and patient mobilisation after free flap procedures in the lower extremity are considered to be very important in reducing complications and in protecting the flap from edema and volume overload. This article demonstrates that there is a wide variety in flap training regimes. It aims to help readers evaluate their own regimes and provides guidance for an individualised patient-oriented regime.