MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/pmrj.13105

Медицинская библиотека · PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2024

Utilization of rehabilitation services in violent versus nonviolent traumatic spinal cord injury.

Barnett Heather M, Wilson Josh M, Kunapaisal Thitikan, Nehra Deepika, Vavilala Monica S, Hoffman Jeanne M, Crane Deborah A

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Violence is the third leading cause of spinal cord injury (SCI) in the United States, and people with violence-related SCI have worse long-term outcomes compared to other traumatic SCI etiologies. Little is known, however, about the underlying reasons for these differences. Access to and utilization of rehabilitation services may differ in this population, but their outpatient care has not been previously investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate differences in utilization patterns of outpatient rehabilitation services between people with violence-related SCI and other traumatic SCI etiologies.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care hospital system.

PATIENTS: A total of 41 patients with violence-related SCI residing in King County at the time of injury who completed inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) in our institution were identified from the hospital trauma registry and matched with 41 control patients with nonviolent traumatic SCI.

INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The number of appointments attended, canceled, and missed during the first year after discharge from IPR were obtained by chart review for physical medicine & rehabilitation (PM&R) physicians and therapy services.

RESULTS

People with violence-related SCI had decreased follow-up with outpatient rehabilitation services after IPR discharge compared to non-violent traumatic SCI, including PM&R (2.50 ± 2.44 vs. 3.76 ± 2.21 visits, β = -1.28, p = .017), physical therapy (8.91 ± 11.02 vs. 17.57 ± 15.26, β = -9.79, p = .009), occupational therapy (4.28 ± 7.90 vs. 10.04 ± 14.42, β = -6.18, p = .033), and recreational therapy (0.293 ± 0.955 vs. 1.37 ± 2.86, β = -1.07, p = .035). The rate of missed appointments was also higher among people with violence-related SCI compared to controls for PM&R (25.2% ± 28.5% vs. 9.9% ± 16.5%, β = 14.6%, p = .014) and physical therapy (26.0% ± 32.0% vs 4.2% ± 13.2%, β = 22.1%, p = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with violence-related SCI had fewer follow-up appointments with PM&R physicians and other allied health professionals and were more likely to miss scheduled appointments compared to other traumatic SCI etiologies. Decreased outpatient follow-up may affect long-term outcomes for people with violence-related SCI.

Для цитирования: Barnett Heather M, Wilson Josh M, Kunapaisal Thitikan, Nehra Deepika, Vavilala Monica S, Hoffman Jeanne M, Crane Deborah A. Utilization of rehabilitation services in violent versus nonviolent traumatic spinal cord injury.. PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13105.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.