Acta neurologica Belgica · 2024
Histopathological analysis of the wall enhancement of the spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae's draining veins.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hu Xiaojun, Diao Yuhang, Hao Zhenghao, Hao Mingyu, Xie Minghao, Rong Hongtao, Zhu Tao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The mechanism behind SDAVF is still unclear. We discovered that the vessel wall of the SDAVF-DV occasionally showed enhancement in MRI, and this study assessed the relationship between the enhancement of the draining vein's wall and its histology.
METHODS: For histopathologic analysis, 16 draining vein samples from 16 patients with SDAVF were included, 3 normal arteries and 3 normal veins were chosen as comparison. We assessed the imaging and microscopic characteristics of the draining veins in SDAVF patients. The former included the presence of significant enhancement of the wall of the draining vein in MRI, and the latter included the adherence, aggregation, infiltration of pro-inflammatory factors and inflammatory cells. Immuno-histochemical staining was performed using IL-1β, IL-8, TGF-β as well as MPO and MMP-9, and positive results were counted. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether the infiltration of inflammatory cells was connected to vessel wall enhancement in the SDAVF-DV.
RESULTS: Infiltration of inflammatory cells was significantly higher in SDAVF-DV compared to normal vessels, 7 out of 16 patients significantly had enhancement of the vessel wall of SDAVF-DV, and logistic regression analysis showed that samples with more infiltration of inflammatory cells were more likely to show enhancement of the SDAVF-DV walls.
CONCLUSION: There was considerable inflammatory cells infiltration in SDAVF-DV, and this may explain why their vessel wall had such a significant enhancement in MRI.
METHODS: For histopathologic analysis, 16 draining vein samples from 16 patients with SDAVF were included, 3 normal arteries and 3 normal veins were chosen as comparison. We assessed the imaging and microscopic characteristics of the draining veins in SDAVF patients. The former included the presence of significant enhancement of the wall of the draining vein in MRI, and the latter included the adherence, aggregation, infiltration of pro-inflammatory factors and inflammatory cells. Immuno-histochemical staining was performed using IL-1β, IL-8, TGF-β as well as MPO and MMP-9, and positive results were counted. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether the infiltration of inflammatory cells was connected to vessel wall enhancement in the SDAVF-DV.
RESULTS: Infiltration of inflammatory cells was significantly higher in SDAVF-DV compared to normal vessels, 7 out of 16 patients significantly had enhancement of the vessel wall of SDAVF-DV, and logistic regression analysis showed that samples with more infiltration of inflammatory cells were more likely to show enhancement of the SDAVF-DV walls.
CONCLUSION: There was considerable inflammatory cells infiltration in SDAVF-DV, and this may explain why their vessel wall had such a significant enhancement in MRI.