American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2021
Effectiveness of the Endoscopic Prelacrimal Recess Approach for Maxillary Sinus Inverted Papilloma Removal: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Do Hyun, Kim Sung Won, Son Soo Ah, Jung Jaehoon, Kim So-Hyun, Hwang Se Hwan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Conventional minimally invasive surgery has a high recurrence rate, and nasal morbidity can occur if the scope of surgery is expanded to complete removal of maxillary sinus inverted papilloma.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy of the endoscopic prelacrimal recess approach (EPLRA) for maxillary sinus inverted papilloma removal.
METHODS: Eighteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. Articles comparing the prelacrimal recess approach with conventional surgery (endoscopic surgery or the Caldwell-Luc operation) for inverted papilloma removal were included. Outcomes of interest included recurrence and postoperative morbidities. The methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
RESULTS: The recurrence rates of inverted papilloma, postoperative facial or gingival numbness, and alar collapse were 3.13% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32, 7.27), 9.02% (95% CI: 3.70, 20.39), and 3.39% (95% CI: 1.28, 8.68), respectively. The recurrence rate of inverted papilloma was significantly lower after the EPLRA than after conventional surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 0.2290; 95% CI: 0.0808, 0.6489). However, there were no significant differences between the procedures in the rates of facial or gingival numbness (OR = 0.4567; 95% CI: 0.1497, 1.3933), epistaxis (OR = 0.3150; 95% CI: 0.0471, 2.1044), or periorbital swelling (OR = 1.2405; 95% CI: 0.1205, 12.7731).
CONCLUSIONS: The EPLRA can preserve the lacrimal system and is useful for maxillary sinus inverted papilloma removal due to a lower recurrence rate compared with conventional surgeries.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy of the endoscopic prelacrimal recess approach (EPLRA) for maxillary sinus inverted papilloma removal.
METHODS: Eighteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. Articles comparing the prelacrimal recess approach with conventional surgery (endoscopic surgery or the Caldwell-Luc operation) for inverted papilloma removal were included. Outcomes of interest included recurrence and postoperative morbidities. The methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
RESULTS: The recurrence rates of inverted papilloma, postoperative facial or gingival numbness, and alar collapse were 3.13% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32, 7.27), 9.02% (95% CI: 3.70, 20.39), and 3.39% (95% CI: 1.28, 8.68), respectively. The recurrence rate of inverted papilloma was significantly lower after the EPLRA than after conventional surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 0.2290; 95% CI: 0.0808, 0.6489). However, there were no significant differences between the procedures in the rates of facial or gingival numbness (OR = 0.4567; 95% CI: 0.1497, 1.3933), epistaxis (OR = 0.3150; 95% CI: 0.0471, 2.1044), or periorbital swelling (OR = 1.2405; 95% CI: 0.1205, 12.7731).
CONCLUSIONS: The EPLRA can preserve the lacrimal system and is useful for maxillary sinus inverted papilloma removal due to a lower recurrence rate compared with conventional surgeries.