MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0020-7292(98)00196-9

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 1998

Medical versus surgical abortion.

Cabezas E

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of an oral drug regimen of medical abortion compared with surgical abortion.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

500 women with amenorrhea < 56 days chose either surgical abortion or 600 mg of mifepristone (RU-486) followed by 400 microg of misoprostol after 48 h.

RESULTS

Medical regimen had more side effects than surgical abortion, including bleeding, cramping, nausea and vomiting. Only fever was more frequent in the surgical method. The failure rates for medical abortion exceeded those for surgical abortion, 16.0% vs. 4.0%. The adolescents' failure rate in the medical regimen group was only 1.7%. Several failures on medical abortion were not true drug failures, but surgical interventions not medically necessary (misdiagnosis). Women were satisfied with either method, but more preferred medical abortion.

CONCLUSION

Medical methods are safe, effective, simpler and potentially allow greater privacy than surgical abortion methods. Therefore, medical methods could be the method of choice for abortion, particularly for adolescents.

Для цитирования: Cabezas E. Medical versus surgical abortion.. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 1998. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(98)00196-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.