Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
Phase 1 open-label study of ASP9801, an oncolytic virus, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.
СтатьяКлиническое исследование I фазыМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Villano John L, Luke Jason J, Julian Ricklie, Fountzilas Christos, Patel Manish R, Chisamore Michael J, Bhattacharya Pranob, Takeshita Shigeru, Soukharev Serguei, Yamada Shunsuke, Zhang Leshi, Wentzel Kristopher P
Аннотация
PURPOSE: ASP9801, an oncolytic virus encoding interleukin-7 and interleukin-12, was assessed for safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors in a Phase 1 study.
METHODS: The study comprised Part 1 ASP9801 monotherapy dose escalation and Part 2 dose expansion with ASP9801 monotherapy or plus pembrolizumab. Each part was divided into Groups A (ASP9801 injection into cutaneous/subcutaneous lesions) and B (ASP9801 injection into visceral lesions). Primary objectives were safety and maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended Phase 2 dose expansion (RP2D); secondary objectives included antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics.
RESULTS: In dose escalation, 17 and 10 patients in Groups A and B, respectively, received treatment. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; grade 3 cytokine release syndrome) was reported in Group A. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥30% of patients in Group A were pyrexia and in Group B were pyrexia, chills, vomiting, nausea, fatigue, and headache. AEs leading to death occurred in two patients in Group A (one each for malignant neoplasm progression and sepsis); neither was attributed to ASP9801. The RP2D of ASP9801 was 5×108 plaque-forming unit/mL. In Part 2 dose expansion Group A, 12 patients received monotherapy RP2D, 5 received monotherapy induction, and 2 received ASP9801 plus pembrolizumab. In Group B, 9 and 11 patients received ASP9801 monotherapy or plus pembrolizumab, respectively. One DLT occurred in Group B combination safety cohort (grade 2 pyrexia and mental status change; grade 3 hypoxia, lymphopenia, and pneumonitis). During dose expansion, TRAEs in ≥30% of any cohort (>1 patient) in Group A were nausea, fatigue, chills, pyrexia, and headache and in Group B were nausea, vomiting, fatigue, chills, pyrexia, and lymphocyte count decreased. AEs led to death in two patients in Group A monotherapy and one patient in Group B monotherapy cohorts, all due to malignant neoplasm progression; none were attributed to ASP9801. One patient in Group B combination safety cohort achieved confirmed partial response (objective response rate, 9.1% (95% CI 0.3% to 52.7%)).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ASP9801 alone or plus pembrolizumab was generally well tolerated; however, the study was stopped due to lack of efficacy during dose expansion.
METHODS: The study comprised Part 1 ASP9801 monotherapy dose escalation and Part 2 dose expansion with ASP9801 monotherapy or plus pembrolizumab. Each part was divided into Groups A (ASP9801 injection into cutaneous/subcutaneous lesions) and B (ASP9801 injection into visceral lesions). Primary objectives were safety and maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended Phase 2 dose expansion (RP2D); secondary objectives included antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics.
RESULTS: In dose escalation, 17 and 10 patients in Groups A and B, respectively, received treatment. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; grade 3 cytokine release syndrome) was reported in Group A. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥30% of patients in Group A were pyrexia and in Group B were pyrexia, chills, vomiting, nausea, fatigue, and headache. AEs leading to death occurred in two patients in Group A (one each for malignant neoplasm progression and sepsis); neither was attributed to ASP9801. The RP2D of ASP9801 was 5×108 plaque-forming unit/mL. In Part 2 dose expansion Group A, 12 patients received monotherapy RP2D, 5 received monotherapy induction, and 2 received ASP9801 plus pembrolizumab. In Group B, 9 and 11 patients received ASP9801 monotherapy or plus pembrolizumab, respectively. One DLT occurred in Group B combination safety cohort (grade 2 pyrexia and mental status change; grade 3 hypoxia, lymphopenia, and pneumonitis). During dose expansion, TRAEs in ≥30% of any cohort (>1 patient) in Group A were nausea, fatigue, chills, pyrexia, and headache and in Group B were nausea, vomiting, fatigue, chills, pyrexia, and lymphocyte count decreased. AEs led to death in two patients in Group A monotherapy and one patient in Group B monotherapy cohorts, all due to malignant neoplasm progression; none were attributed to ASP9801. One patient in Group B combination safety cohort achieved confirmed partial response (objective response rate, 9.1% (95% CI 0.3% to 52.7%)).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ASP9801 alone or plus pembrolizumab was generally well tolerated; however, the study was stopped due to lack of efficacy during dose expansion.