The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2000
Adverse pregnancy outcome following post-chorionic villus sampling amniocentesis compared to chorionic villus sampling.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim S K, Cho D J, Kim J W, Chung J E, Yang Y H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the adverse pregnancy outcome of post-chorionic villus sampling (CVS) amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling.
METHODS: Adverse pregnancy outcomes of 32 post-CVS amniocentesis cases and 264 CVS only cases were compared. The base-line characteristics were comparable in the 2 groups.
RESULTS: One (3.1%) chromosomal abnormality was detected in the post-CVS amniocentesis group, compared to 5 (1.8%) in the CVS only group (p > 0.05). The fetal loss rate (spontaneous abortions and stillbirths) among continuing pregnancies was 3.2% in the post-CVS amniocentesis group and 3.5% in the CVS only group (p > 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of neonatal death, preterm delivery, fetal growth restriction, or congenital anomalies between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: Adverse pregnancy outcome occurred at a similar frequency in the post-CVS amniocentesis group as in the CVS only group. Therefore, a subsequent amniocentesis after CVS can be considered as a safe procedure that does not introduce any additional adverse pregnancy outcome compared to that of CVS only.
METHODS: Adverse pregnancy outcomes of 32 post-CVS amniocentesis cases and 264 CVS only cases were compared. The base-line characteristics were comparable in the 2 groups.
RESULTS: One (3.1%) chromosomal abnormality was detected in the post-CVS amniocentesis group, compared to 5 (1.8%) in the CVS only group (p > 0.05). The fetal loss rate (spontaneous abortions and stillbirths) among continuing pregnancies was 3.2% in the post-CVS amniocentesis group and 3.5% in the CVS only group (p > 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of neonatal death, preterm delivery, fetal growth restriction, or congenital anomalies between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: Adverse pregnancy outcome occurred at a similar frequency in the post-CVS amniocentesis group as in the CVS only group. Therefore, a subsequent amniocentesis after CVS can be considered as a safe procedure that does not introduce any additional adverse pregnancy outcome compared to that of CVS only.