Allergologie select · 2026
Contact allergy to a titanium port catheter: Diagnostic challenges and clinical resolution.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fugger Silas, Kauffmann Alexander, Dickel Heinrich
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Titanium and its alloys are widely used in modern medical devices because of their favorable biocompatibility and mechanical properties. Allergic reactions to titanium-based implants are considered rare, and their diagnosis is hampered by the poor dermal penetration of metallic allergens.
CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old female patient with seronegative myasthenia gravis requiring parenteral nutrition presented with persistent inflammatory dermatitis overlying a titanium port catheter (X-Port BARD Titan low-profile) 4 weeks after implantation in July 2023. Despite initial diagnostic uncertainty and sequential management modifications, her condition continued to deteriorate. Similar eruptions developed after re-implantation of the same titanium port model on the contralateral thorax. Rigorous patch testing incorporating standardized tape-stripping and extended reading intervals revealed positive sensitization to the titanium port body, while all other port components and an alternative plastic port system (BARD SlimPort M.R.I. Ultra Low-Profile) tested negative. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed the titanium body composition as a Ti-Al6-V4 alloy. Substitution with the plastic port catheter in February 2025 resulted in complete symptom resolution, with sustained clinical remission through July 2025.
CONCLUSION: Although very uncommon, contact sensitization to titanium medical devices can occur and may present significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Rigorous patch testing methodology, incorporating standardized tape-stripping and extended 168-hour readings, appears essential for detecting delayed-type hypersensitivity to metallic implants. Clinical resolution following biocompatible device substitution supports an allergic etiology in this case.
CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old female patient with seronegative myasthenia gravis requiring parenteral nutrition presented with persistent inflammatory dermatitis overlying a titanium port catheter (X-Port BARD Titan low-profile) 4 weeks after implantation in July 2023. Despite initial diagnostic uncertainty and sequential management modifications, her condition continued to deteriorate. Similar eruptions developed after re-implantation of the same titanium port model on the contralateral thorax. Rigorous patch testing incorporating standardized tape-stripping and extended reading intervals revealed positive sensitization to the titanium port body, while all other port components and an alternative plastic port system (BARD SlimPort M.R.I. Ultra Low-Profile) tested negative. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed the titanium body composition as a Ti-Al6-V4 alloy. Substitution with the plastic port catheter in February 2025 resulted in complete symptom resolution, with sustained clinical remission through July 2025.
CONCLUSION: Although very uncommon, contact sensitization to titanium medical devices can occur and may present significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Rigorous patch testing methodology, incorporating standardized tape-stripping and extended 168-hour readings, appears essential for detecting delayed-type hypersensitivity to metallic implants. Clinical resolution following biocompatible device substitution supports an allergic etiology in this case.