Journal of pediatric surgery · 2003
Endoscopic follow-up in esophageal atresia-for how long is it necessary?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schalamon Johannes, Lindahl Harry, Saarikoski Hanna, Rintala Risto J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to find out how long it is necessary to follow-up esophageal atresia patients endoscopically to prevent irreversible mucosal changes.
METHODS: Seventy-four of 79 long-term survivors with esophageal atresia and primary anastomosis underwent a total of 322 esophagogastroduodenoscopies during a follow-up period of 0.5 to 19 years (mean, 10.3) after the primary operation. For analysis, the biopsy findings were divided into 2 groups: good, histologically normal or only mildly inflamed mucosa; unfavorable, moderate or severe esophagitis or gastric metaplasia. Fundoplication irrespective of indications was considered unfavorable. The results were analyzed using actuarial survival analysis; the changing point was when a "good" turned into "unfavorable."
RESULTS: Forty-five patients (61%) remained in the "good" group throughout the study period; 15 of those (20%) had completely normal findings. Nine patients (12%) had moderate, one (1%) had severe esophagitis, and 13 patients (18%) had gastric metaplasia. Fundoplication was performed on 21 patients (28%).
CONCLUSIONS: About 40% of esophageal atresia patients eventually have significant esophageal mucosal pathology or need to have a fundoplication. The majority of these changes appear before the age of 3 years. Routine endoscopic follow-up of esophageal atresia patients is recommended at least to the age of 3 years.
METHODS: Seventy-four of 79 long-term survivors with esophageal atresia and primary anastomosis underwent a total of 322 esophagogastroduodenoscopies during a follow-up period of 0.5 to 19 years (mean, 10.3) after the primary operation. For analysis, the biopsy findings were divided into 2 groups: good, histologically normal or only mildly inflamed mucosa; unfavorable, moderate or severe esophagitis or gastric metaplasia. Fundoplication irrespective of indications was considered unfavorable. The results were analyzed using actuarial survival analysis; the changing point was when a "good" turned into "unfavorable."
RESULTS: Forty-five patients (61%) remained in the "good" group throughout the study period; 15 of those (20%) had completely normal findings. Nine patients (12%) had moderate, one (1%) had severe esophagitis, and 13 patients (18%) had gastric metaplasia. Fundoplication was performed on 21 patients (28%).
CONCLUSIONS: About 40% of esophageal atresia patients eventually have significant esophageal mucosal pathology or need to have a fundoplication. The majority of these changes appear before the age of 3 years. Routine endoscopic follow-up of esophageal atresia patients is recommended at least to the age of 3 years.