Dual Therapy vs. Monotherapy for the Patent Ductus Arteriosus: A Systematic Review.

To evaluate the efficacy of dual patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) pharmacotherapy compared to monotherapy we searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and references of relevant articles through October 20, 2021 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing dual PDA treatment vs. monotherapy. Data were analyzed using a fixed effects model. The fixed effects model assumes that all studies included in a meta-analysis are estimating a single true underlying effect, that of ductal closure. Primary outcome was ductal closure; secondary outcome was surgical ligation. Of 170 articles retrieved, three cohort studies and two RCTs were included, totaling 470 patients: 384 babies received monotherapy and 86 dual therapy. Because of the small numbers, RCTs and cohort studies were pooled for analysis. Ductus closed in 67% of those who received combination compared with 58% those with monotherapy. Overall fixed effect shows an OR of 1.97 [1.10; 3.53; p = 0.023] favoring dual therapy. Dual pharmacologic treatment appears more effective than monotherapy. Future well-powered, high-quality, prospective RCTs are needed to further investigate this potential approach.