JHLT open · 2025
Mid-term follow-up of non-ischemic heart preservation in heart transplantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jernryd Victoria, Braun Oscar, Paskevicius Audrius, Metzsch Carsten, Lofman Ida Haugen, Ragnarsson Sigurdur, Papageorgiou Joanna-Maria, Ingvarsson Annika, Steen Stig, Nilsson Johan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Ex-vivo perfusion of donor hearts is gaining importance in minimizing ischemia-reperfusion injury during heart transplantation. The Non-Ischemic Heart Preservation (NIHP) device, developed in 2016, has shown promising results in pilot studies. This study aims to compare the mid-term follow-up outcomes of NIHP with traditional Static Cold Storage (SCS) in heart transplantation.
METHODS: This hybrid cohort study included 47 patients. The primary outcome was event-free survival at one year, defined as survival free of severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use within 7 days, acute cellular rejection (ACR ≥ 2R), and death. Secondary outcomes included graft function, incidence of adverse events at one year, and overall survival.
RESULTS: At 1 year, event-free survival was observed in 12 of 15 patients (80%) in the NIHP group and 23 of 32 patients (72%) in the SCS group. No patients in the NIHP group developed severe PGD, compared to three patients in the SCS group. ACR ≥ 2R occurred in 2/15 (13%) of NIHP patients and 5/32 (16%) of SCS patients. Overall survival at 5 years was 14/15 (93%) for NIHP and 24/32 (75%) for SCS. Immediate graft function and markers of ischemia-reperfusion injury favored the NIHP group, with lower CK-MB and lactate levels post-transplantation. Adverse events were comparable between groups, although the NIHP group had fewer severe complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The NIHP system demonstrated outcomes comparable to SCS in heart transplantation, with improved graft function and reduced markers of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Further research is required to confirm these findings.
METHODS: This hybrid cohort study included 47 patients. The primary outcome was event-free survival at one year, defined as survival free of severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use within 7 days, acute cellular rejection (ACR ≥ 2R), and death. Secondary outcomes included graft function, incidence of adverse events at one year, and overall survival.
RESULTS: At 1 year, event-free survival was observed in 12 of 15 patients (80%) in the NIHP group and 23 of 32 patients (72%) in the SCS group. No patients in the NIHP group developed severe PGD, compared to three patients in the SCS group. ACR ≥ 2R occurred in 2/15 (13%) of NIHP patients and 5/32 (16%) of SCS patients. Overall survival at 5 years was 14/15 (93%) for NIHP and 24/32 (75%) for SCS. Immediate graft function and markers of ischemia-reperfusion injury favored the NIHP group, with lower CK-MB and lactate levels post-transplantation. Adverse events were comparable between groups, although the NIHP group had fewer severe complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The NIHP system demonstrated outcomes comparable to SCS in heart transplantation, with improved graft function and reduced markers of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Further research is required to confirm these findings.