World journal of urology · 2019
Non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty is favored over transecting techniques.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Virasoro Ramón, DeLong Jessica M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To present current evidence supporting the vessel sparing technique to reconstruct bulbar urethral strictures via primary anastomosis.
METHODS: English literature review of presented series of transecting and non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty from 2000 to 2018.
RESULTS: Since its introduction in 2007, vessel-sparing excision and primary anastomosis (VS-EPA) has been utilized in multiple centers across the world. Success rates range from 90 to 98%, comparable to traditional transecting EPA. Complication rates and erectile function outcomes are similar or better in VS-EPA, according to recent publications.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-transection excision and primary anastomosis is a well-tolerated, highly successful reconstructive option for short bulbar urethral strictures in appropriately selected patients. Results are comparable with traditional transecting anastomosis and mid-term multinational follow-up has proven efficacy and safety of the technique. Further well-designed multi-institutional studies are necessary to determine superiority to traditional EPA in terms of surgical outcomes and erectile function preservation.
METHODS: English literature review of presented series of transecting and non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty from 2000 to 2018.
RESULTS: Since its introduction in 2007, vessel-sparing excision and primary anastomosis (VS-EPA) has been utilized in multiple centers across the world. Success rates range from 90 to 98%, comparable to traditional transecting EPA. Complication rates and erectile function outcomes are similar or better in VS-EPA, according to recent publications.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-transection excision and primary anastomosis is a well-tolerated, highly successful reconstructive option for short bulbar urethral strictures in appropriately selected patients. Results are comparable with traditional transecting anastomosis and mid-term multinational follow-up has proven efficacy and safety of the technique. Further well-designed multi-institutional studies are necessary to determine superiority to traditional EPA in terms of surgical outcomes and erectile function preservation.