Retinal cases & brief reports · 2022
A CASE OF RAPIDLY PROGRESSIVE RETINOPATHY ASSOCIATED WITH PEMBROLIZUMAB IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR METASTATIC UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sakai Daiki, Hirami Yasuhiko, Sugita Sunao, Maeda Akiko, Matsumiya Wataru, Nakamura Makoto, Kurimoto Yasuo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To describe a novel case of bilateral rapidly progressive retinopathy after immunotherapy with pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
METHODS: Case report.
RESULTS: A 64-year-old man undergoing pembrolizumab immunotherapy was referred to our hospital because of bilateral acute vision loss. His best-corrected visual acuity was 20/30 in the right eye and 20/320 in the left eye, and a visual field test revealed central and paracentral scotomas in the right eye and central scotoma in the left eye. We suspected immune-related retinopathy based on the progressive photoreceptor damage with abnormal electroretinogram findings, absence of overt intraocular inflammation, and presence of malignancy. Cessation of pembrolizumab and steroid pulse therapy followed by decreasing oral prednisolone improved visual function and photoreceptor damage, although there was recurrence after pembrolizumab was restarted.
CONCLUSION: We reported a case of rapidly progressive retinopathy that may have been triggered by pembrolizumab immunotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. High-dose corticosteroid pulse therapy was effective in reversing photoreceptor damage.
METHODS: Case report.
RESULTS: A 64-year-old man undergoing pembrolizumab immunotherapy was referred to our hospital because of bilateral acute vision loss. His best-corrected visual acuity was 20/30 in the right eye and 20/320 in the left eye, and a visual field test revealed central and paracentral scotomas in the right eye and central scotoma in the left eye. We suspected immune-related retinopathy based on the progressive photoreceptor damage with abnormal electroretinogram findings, absence of overt intraocular inflammation, and presence of malignancy. Cessation of pembrolizumab and steroid pulse therapy followed by decreasing oral prednisolone improved visual function and photoreceptor damage, although there was recurrence after pembrolizumab was restarted.
CONCLUSION: We reported a case of rapidly progressive retinopathy that may have been triggered by pembrolizumab immunotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. High-dose corticosteroid pulse therapy was effective in reversing photoreceptor damage.