Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2012
[Outcomes of four distinct fixation methods in the conservative treatment of fifth metacarpal neck fractures].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kiliç Ayhan, Sökücü Sami, Basilgan Seçkin, Yeniocak Sedat, Cetinkaya Engin, Parmaksizoğlu Atilla Sancar, Kabukcuoğlu Yavuz Selim
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We evaluated four distinct fixation methods for the conservative treatment of neck fractures of the fifth metacarpal.
METHODS: Patients in our clinics who were treated with non-surgical methods following closed reduction between 2008 and 2009 were evaluated prospectively. In this study consisting of 60 male patients, the following fixation methods were applied for four weeks: circular cast extending from the wrist to the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint (Group A), circular cast covering semiflexed metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and DIP from the wrist to the DIP joint (Group B), circular self-adherent wrap covering metacarpal bones II-V, from the wrist to the DIP joint (Group C), and ulnar gutter splint covering semi-flexed IV-V MCP, proximal (PIP) and DIP joints (Group D). In patients who were followed up with anteroposterior (AP) and oblique radiography, angulations and metacarpal lengths were measured before and after reduction.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with an average age of 30 (SD: 9) years completed the study. For fractures with radiographic angulation of 17 degrees (SD: 11) and 46 degrees (SD: 11.7) before treatment, union was achieved with an angulation of 5 degrees (SD: 5.9) and 27 degrees (SD: 10.5) after four weeks (p: 0.05).
CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was found between the non-surgical methods applied for treatment of fifth metacarpal fractures.
METHODS: Patients in our clinics who were treated with non-surgical methods following closed reduction between 2008 and 2009 were evaluated prospectively. In this study consisting of 60 male patients, the following fixation methods were applied for four weeks: circular cast extending from the wrist to the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint (Group A), circular cast covering semiflexed metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and DIP from the wrist to the DIP joint (Group B), circular self-adherent wrap covering metacarpal bones II-V, from the wrist to the DIP joint (Group C), and ulnar gutter splint covering semi-flexed IV-V MCP, proximal (PIP) and DIP joints (Group D). In patients who were followed up with anteroposterior (AP) and oblique radiography, angulations and metacarpal lengths were measured before and after reduction.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with an average age of 30 (SD: 9) years completed the study. For fractures with radiographic angulation of 17 degrees (SD: 11) and 46 degrees (SD: 11.7) before treatment, union was achieved with an angulation of 5 degrees (SD: 5.9) and 27 degrees (SD: 10.5) after four weeks (p: 0.05).
CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was found between the non-surgical methods applied for treatment of fifth metacarpal fractures.