Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
Progression of Portal Hypertension in Acute Cellular Rejection After Liver Transplantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Choi Ji Young, Kim Kyoung Won, Jang Jong Keon, Kwon Heon-Ju, Yoon Young-In, Song Gi-Won, Lee Sung-Gyu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate the frequency of computed tomography features indicating progression of portal hypertension and their clinical relevance in patients who experienced acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 141 patients with pathologically diagnosed acute cellular rejection following liver transplant. Patients were divided into early and late rejection groups according to the time of diagnosis. Two radiologists analyzed the interval changes in spleen size and variceal engorgement on computed tomography images obtained at the times of surgery and biopsy. Aggravation of splenomegaly and variceal engorgement were considered computed tomography features associated with the progression of portal hypertension. Clinical outcomes, including responses to treatment and graft survival, were compared between patients with and without these features.
RESULTS: The frequency of progression of portal hypertension was 31.9% and did not differ significantly in patients who experienced early (30.8% [28/91]) and late (34.0% [17/50]) rejection (P = .694). In the late rejection group, computed tomography features indicating progression of portal hypertension were significantly associated with poor response to treatment (P = .033). Graft survival in both the early and late rejection groups did not differ significantly in patients with and without progression of portal hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography features suggesting the progression of portal hypertension were encountered in about one-third of patients who experienced acute cellular rejection after liver transplant. Progression of portal hypertension was significantly related to poor response to treatment in the late rejection group.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 141 patients with pathologically diagnosed acute cellular rejection following liver transplant. Patients were divided into early and late rejection groups according to the time of diagnosis. Two radiologists analyzed the interval changes in spleen size and variceal engorgement on computed tomography images obtained at the times of surgery and biopsy. Aggravation of splenomegaly and variceal engorgement were considered computed tomography features associated with the progression of portal hypertension. Clinical outcomes, including responses to treatment and graft survival, were compared between patients with and without these features.
RESULTS: The frequency of progression of portal hypertension was 31.9% and did not differ significantly in patients who experienced early (30.8% [28/91]) and late (34.0% [17/50]) rejection (P = .694). In the late rejection group, computed tomography features indicating progression of portal hypertension were significantly associated with poor response to treatment (P = .033). Graft survival in both the early and late rejection groups did not differ significantly in patients with and without progression of portal hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography features suggesting the progression of portal hypertension were encountered in about one-third of patients who experienced acute cellular rejection after liver transplant. Progression of portal hypertension was significantly related to poor response to treatment in the late rejection group.