American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2018
Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular retrognathism.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
You Kug-Ho, Kim Kyung-Ho, Lee Kee-Joon, Baik Hyoung-Seon
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to analyze the morphologic features of skeletal units in the mandibles of patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular retrognathism using cone-beam computed tomography.
METHODS: The subjects consisted of 50 adults with facial asymmetry and mandibular retrognathism, divided into the symmetry group (n = 25) and the asymmetry group (n = 25) according to the degree of menton deviation. Three-dimensional computed tomography scans were obtained with cone beam computed tomography. Landmarks were designated on the reconstructed 3-dimensional images. Linear and volumetric measurements were made on the mandibles.
RESULTS: In the asymmetry group, the lengths of condylar, body, and coronoid units were shorter, and condylar width was narrower on the deviated side than on the nondeviated side (P <0.01). The lengths of angular and chin units were not significantly different between the deviated and nondeviated sides (P >0.05). Hemimandibular, ramal, and body volumes were less on the deviated side than on the nondeviated side (P <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Condylar, body, and coronoid units contribute to mandibular asymmetry in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular retrognathism.
METHODS: The subjects consisted of 50 adults with facial asymmetry and mandibular retrognathism, divided into the symmetry group (n = 25) and the asymmetry group (n = 25) according to the degree of menton deviation. Three-dimensional computed tomography scans were obtained with cone beam computed tomography. Landmarks were designated on the reconstructed 3-dimensional images. Linear and volumetric measurements were made on the mandibles.
RESULTS: In the asymmetry group, the lengths of condylar, body, and coronoid units were shorter, and condylar width was narrower on the deviated side than on the nondeviated side (P <0.01). The lengths of angular and chin units were not significantly different between the deviated and nondeviated sides (P >0.05). Hemimandibular, ramal, and body volumes were less on the deviated side than on the nondeviated side (P <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Condylar, body, and coronoid units contribute to mandibular asymmetry in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular retrognathism.