European journal of nutrition · 2022
The effect of iron supplementation on maternal iron deficiency anemia does not differ by baseline anemia type among Tanzanian pregnant women without severe iron deficiency anemia.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abioye Ajibola Ibraheem, Hughes Michael D, Sudfeld Christopher R, Premji Zulfiqarali, Aboud Said, Hamer Davidson H, Roberts Drucilla J, Duggan Christopher P, Fawzi Wafaie W
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Whether anemia type modifies the risk of pregnancy and newborn outcomes and the effectiveness of iron supplementation is unclear. We examined the association of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and non-iron deficiency anemia (NIDA) on the risks of these outcomes and the extent to which anemia type modifies the impact of prenatal iron supplementation.
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a placebo-controlled trial of iron supplementation among 1450 HIV-negative women in Tanzania. Eligibility criteria included gestational age < 27 weeks, hemoglobin > 85 g/L, and ferritin > 12 µg/L. Individuals were categorized as non-anemia, IDA or NIDA using hemoglobin, ferritin and CRP. Analyses were conducted using regression models and likelihood ratio tests.
RESULTS: Compared to the non-anemia group, delivery hemoglobin was lower by 15 g/L (95% CI 10.9, 19.3) in the baseline IDA group, and 7.3 g/L (95% CI 3.1, 11.5) in the baseline NIDA group. The RRs of anemia severity, iron deficiency, placental malaria, stillbirths, perinatal mortality, birthweight, and preterm birth were not different among women in the baseline NIDA group (vs. non-anemia) compared to the baseline IDA group (vs. non-anemia). The difference in the mean delivery hemoglobin for iron supplementation and placebo arms was 8 g/L (95% CI 6, 11) in the non-anemia group, 7 g/L (95% CI 2, 13) in the NIDA group, and 16 g/L (95% CI 10, 22) in the IDA group.
CONCLUSION: Iron supplementation is effective even among pregnant women with NIDA.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01119612 (May 7, 2010).
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a placebo-controlled trial of iron supplementation among 1450 HIV-negative women in Tanzania. Eligibility criteria included gestational age < 27 weeks, hemoglobin > 85 g/L, and ferritin > 12 µg/L. Individuals were categorized as non-anemia, IDA or NIDA using hemoglobin, ferritin and CRP. Analyses were conducted using regression models and likelihood ratio tests.
RESULTS: Compared to the non-anemia group, delivery hemoglobin was lower by 15 g/L (95% CI 10.9, 19.3) in the baseline IDA group, and 7.3 g/L (95% CI 3.1, 11.5) in the baseline NIDA group. The RRs of anemia severity, iron deficiency, placental malaria, stillbirths, perinatal mortality, birthweight, and preterm birth were not different among women in the baseline NIDA group (vs. non-anemia) compared to the baseline IDA group (vs. non-anemia). The difference in the mean delivery hemoglobin for iron supplementation and placebo arms was 8 g/L (95% CI 6, 11) in the non-anemia group, 7 g/L (95% CI 2, 13) in the NIDA group, and 16 g/L (95% CI 10, 22) in the IDA group.
CONCLUSION: Iron supplementation is effective even among pregnant women with NIDA.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01119612 (May 7, 2010).