MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jama.2024.18080

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA · 2024

Low-Dose Triple-Pill vs Standard-Care Protocols for Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ojji Dike B, Salam Abdul, Sani Mahmoud U, Ogah Okechukwu S, Schutte Aletta E, Huffman Mark D, Pant Rashmi, Ghosh Arpita, Dhurjati Rupasvi, Lakshmi Josyula K, Ripiye Nanna R, Orji Ikechukwu A, Kana Shehu A, Abdussalam Tijjani, Olawumi Abdulgafar L, Alfa Isiaka M, Orimolade Olanike Allison, Ajayi Moses O, Rodgers Anthony

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

With the high burden of hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa, there is a need for effective, safe and scalable treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To compare, among Black African adults, the effectiveness and safety of a novel low-dose triple-pill protocol compared with a standard-care protocol for blood pressure lowering.

DESIGN AND

SETTING

Randomized, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter trial conducted in public hospital-based family medicine clinics in Nigeria.

PARTICIPANTS

Black African adults with uncontrolled hypertension (≥140/90 mm Hg) who were untreated or receiving a single blood pressure-lowering drug.

INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly allocated to low-dose triple-pill or standard-care protocols. The triple-pill protocol involved a novel combination of telmisartan, amlodipine, and indapamide in triple one-quarter, one-half, and standard doses (ie, 10/1.25/0.625 mg, 20/2.5/1.25 mg, and 40/5/2.5 mg), with accelerated up-titration. The standard-care protocol was the Nigeria hypertension treatment protocol starting with amlodipine (5 mg).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary effectiveness outcome was the reduction in home mean systolic blood pressure, and the primary safety outcome was discontinuation of trial treatment due to adverse events, both from randomization to month 6.

RESULTS

The first participant was randomized on July 19, 2022, and the last follow-up visit was on July 18, 2024. Among 300 randomized participants (54% female; mean age, 52 years; baseline mean home blood pressure, 151/97 mm Hg; and clinic blood pressure, 156/97 mm Hg), 273 (91%) completed the trial. At month 6, mean home systolic blood pressure was on average 31 mm Hg (95% CI, 28 to 33 mm Hg) lower in the triple-pill protocol group and 26 mm Hg (95% CI, 22 to 28 mm Hg) lower in the standard-care protocol group (adjusted difference, -5.8 mm Hg [95% CI, -8.0 to -3.6]; P < .001]). At month 6, clinic blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg) was 82% vs 72% (risk difference, 10% [95% CI, -2% to 20%]) and home blood pressure control (<130/80 mm Hg) was 62% vs 28% (risk difference, 33% [95% CI, 22% to 44%]) in the triple-pill compared with the standard-care protocol group; these were 2 of 21 prespecified secondary effectiveness end points. No participants discontinued trial treatment due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among Black African adults with uncontrolled hypertension, a low-dose triple-pill protocol achieved better blood pressure lowering and control with good tolerability compared with the standard-care protocol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: PACTR202107579572114.

Для цитирования: Ojji Dike B, Salam Abdul, Sani Mahmoud U, Ogah Okechukwu S, Schutte Aletta E, Huffman Mark D, Pant Rashmi, Ghosh Arpita, Dhurjati Rupasvi, Lakshmi Josyula K, Ripiye Nanna R, Orji Ikechukwu A, Kana Shehu A, Abdussalam Tijjani, Olawumi Abdulgafar L, Alfa Isiaka M, Orimolade Olanike Allison, Ajayi Moses O, Rodgers Anthony. Low-Dose Triple-Pill vs Standard-Care Protocols for Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria: A Randomized Clinical Trial.. JAMA. 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.18080.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.