Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2017
Ocular findings on follow-up in children who received phototherapy for neonatal jaundice.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kara Semra, Yalniz-Akkaya Züleyha, Yeniaras Ayça, Örnek Firdevs, Bilge Yıldız Dallar
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the ocular findings in children between 3 and 5 years of age who had received phototherapy in the neonatal period and to investigate whether they had phototherapy-related permanent ocular damage clinically.
METHODS: The phototherapy group (n = 57) consisted of children who had undergone phototherapy for at least 24 h, and the control group (n = 43) comprised children who had not received phototherapy. Ophthalmic examinations consisted of assessment of visual acuity, convergence near point, ocular movements, ocular alignment, dynamic retinoscopy, cycloplegic refraction and biomicroscopic examination of anterior segment and posterior segment (using a 90 D lens in the latest).
RESULTS: All children were orthophoric and had normal eye movements. A significant difference was found between the phototherapy group and control group regarding convergence near point 3.0 (2.0-5.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-5.0) (p = 0.018), right cycloplegic spherical equivalent 1.0 (0.0-3.0) vs 0.75 (0.0-4.75) (p = 0.011) and left cycloplegic spherical equivalent 1.0 (0.075-3.0) vs 0.75 (0.0-5.25) (p = 0.006).The study groups were similar according to cycloplegic spherical and cylindrical refractions. However, no significant difference was found between the groups regarding the need for eye glasses.
CONCLUSION: Although there were significant differences between the phototherapy and the control groups according to the convergence near point and right and the left eye cycloplegic spherical equivalent, the similarity between the groups regarding the need for eyeglasses suggested that difference was clinically insignificant.
METHODS: The phototherapy group (n = 57) consisted of children who had undergone phototherapy for at least 24 h, and the control group (n = 43) comprised children who had not received phototherapy. Ophthalmic examinations consisted of assessment of visual acuity, convergence near point, ocular movements, ocular alignment, dynamic retinoscopy, cycloplegic refraction and biomicroscopic examination of anterior segment and posterior segment (using a 90 D lens in the latest).
RESULTS: All children were orthophoric and had normal eye movements. A significant difference was found between the phototherapy group and control group regarding convergence near point 3.0 (2.0-5.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-5.0) (p = 0.018), right cycloplegic spherical equivalent 1.0 (0.0-3.0) vs 0.75 (0.0-4.75) (p = 0.011) and left cycloplegic spherical equivalent 1.0 (0.075-3.0) vs 0.75 (0.0-5.25) (p = 0.006).The study groups were similar according to cycloplegic spherical and cylindrical refractions. However, no significant difference was found between the groups regarding the need for eye glasses.
CONCLUSION: Although there were significant differences between the phototherapy and the control groups according to the convergence near point and right and the left eye cycloplegic spherical equivalent, the similarity between the groups regarding the need for eyeglasses suggested that difference was clinically insignificant.