ERJ open research · 2025
Specific content for education and self-management programmes for people with pulmonary fibrosis: a co-creation, multiphase, mixed-method study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Riegler Thomas F, Frei Anja, Wirz Markus, Holland Anne E, Lindell Kathleen, Brun Patrick, Puhan Milo A, Marcin Thimo, Guler Sabina A, PF-HCP-Group
Аннотация
AIMS: This study aimed to identify and establish comprehensive and specific patient education and self-management (PESM) content created by people with pulmonary fibrosis (PF) and healthcare professionals (HCPs).
METHODS: We employed a sequential, multiphase mixed-method approach (qualitative → quantitative → qualitative) incorporating co-creation elements including interviews with people with PF and HCPs, a two-round Delphi study with HCPs and subsequent interviews with people with PF to validate the developed content.
RESULTS: In phase 1, we interviewed 11 people with PF and six healthcare experts in PF. Based on these interviews, we derived 319 items which we distributed in Delphi surveys to 260 HCPs (phase 2). 96 HCPs participated in both Delphi rounds and agreed on 150 out of finally 343 (24 additionally created) items (44%) in seven topics: Staying well with PF; Keeping fit and strong with PF; Managing breathlessness; Managing cough; Managing fatigue; Managing symptoms of anxiety, depression and panic; Using oxygen therapy. In phase 3, six people with PF validated the developed content of phase 2.
CONCLUSION: We identified specific, clinically relevant and meaningful PESM content for PF through a co-creation approach with people with PF and HCPs. The findings not only inform current and future PESM programmes, patients and clinicians, but also highlight specific areas for future research.
METHODS: We employed a sequential, multiphase mixed-method approach (qualitative → quantitative → qualitative) incorporating co-creation elements including interviews with people with PF and HCPs, a two-round Delphi study with HCPs and subsequent interviews with people with PF to validate the developed content.
RESULTS: In phase 1, we interviewed 11 people with PF and six healthcare experts in PF. Based on these interviews, we derived 319 items which we distributed in Delphi surveys to 260 HCPs (phase 2). 96 HCPs participated in both Delphi rounds and agreed on 150 out of finally 343 (24 additionally created) items (44%) in seven topics: Staying well with PF; Keeping fit and strong with PF; Managing breathlessness; Managing cough; Managing fatigue; Managing symptoms of anxiety, depression and panic; Using oxygen therapy. In phase 3, six people with PF validated the developed content of phase 2.
CONCLUSION: We identified specific, clinically relevant and meaningful PESM content for PF through a co-creation approach with people with PF and HCPs. The findings not only inform current and future PESM programmes, patients and clinicians, but also highlight specific areas for future research.