MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/2000656x.2011.613243

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery · 2011

Randomised study of non-bridging external fixation compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable distal radial fractures.

Schønnemann Jesper O, Hansen Torben B, Søballe Kjeld

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This is a randomised study to compare two types of osteosynthesis to mobilise wrists after distal fractures of the radius. Inclusion criteria were Older type 2 and 3 fractures. External fixation was managed with Hoffmann II compact non-bridging. Internal fixation was managed with Micronail. Patients were followed up for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the results of the disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were answers to the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE), grip strength, satisfaction, radial length, and volar tilt. Thirty patients were randomised to have external fixation and 31 to have internal fixation.There were no significant differences in DASH score. Internal fixation gave significantly better grip strength at five (p = 0.00) and 12 weeks (p = 0.03). The operating time was significantly shorter (p = 0.00) when non-bridging external fixation was used, and there were minor radiological differences. An activity-based costing analysis showed that external fixation cost three times more overall.

Для цитирования: Schønnemann Jesper O, Hansen Torben B, Søballe Kjeld. Randomised study of non-bridging external fixation compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable distal radial fractures.. Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.3109/2000656x.2011.613243.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.