Health science reports · 2021
Subjective donor deferral as a tool for increased blood transfusion safety: A cross-sectional observational study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Moura Juliane Girão, Costa Bruno Almeida, Silva Fabiana Aguiar Carneiro, Fechine Francisco Vagnaldo, Macedo Ênio Simas, Barbosa José Lucio Jorge, Santos Franklin José Candido, de Francesco Daher Elizabeth, de Barros Carlos Luciana Maria, Brunetta Denise Menezes
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aims at evaluating whether subjective donor deferral (SDD) has the potential for increasing blood transfusion safety.
BACKGROUND: Appropriate donor selection via clinical and serologic screening is necessary to prevent transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs). One additional strategy adopted by some Brazilian blood transfusion centers (BTCs) is the rejection of a donation by the pre-donation interviewer based on subjective factors.
METHODS/MATERIALS: We conducted a STROBE-guided cross-sectional study including 105 005 prospective donors who presented to our BTC between 1 January 2013, and 31 December 2015. Donors were evaluated for age, gender, education level, donation type and history, confidential unit exclusion, SDD, and results of serologic screening for TTIs.
RESULTS: Even after controlling for potential confounding variables, subjectively deferred donors were more likely to have at least one reactive serology in the standard screening (OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 2.13-3.69; P < .001). They also had a higher risk for testing positive for syphilis (OR: 4.47; 95% CI: 3.05-6.55; P < .001), hepatitis B (OR: 5.69; 95% CI: 2.48-13.08; P < .001), and HIV (OR: 6.14; 95% CI: 3.22-11.69; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Routine implementation of SDD in donor selection may be an effective additional measure to avoid TTIs, highlighting the importance of interviewer experience, perspicacity, and face-to-face contact with donors for blood safety assurance.
BACKGROUND: Appropriate donor selection via clinical and serologic screening is necessary to prevent transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs). One additional strategy adopted by some Brazilian blood transfusion centers (BTCs) is the rejection of a donation by the pre-donation interviewer based on subjective factors.
METHODS/MATERIALS: We conducted a STROBE-guided cross-sectional study including 105 005 prospective donors who presented to our BTC between 1 January 2013, and 31 December 2015. Donors were evaluated for age, gender, education level, donation type and history, confidential unit exclusion, SDD, and results of serologic screening for TTIs.
RESULTS: Even after controlling for potential confounding variables, subjectively deferred donors were more likely to have at least one reactive serology in the standard screening (OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 2.13-3.69; P < .001). They also had a higher risk for testing positive for syphilis (OR: 4.47; 95% CI: 3.05-6.55; P < .001), hepatitis B (OR: 5.69; 95% CI: 2.48-13.08; P < .001), and HIV (OR: 6.14; 95% CI: 3.22-11.69; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Routine implementation of SDD in donor selection may be an effective additional measure to avoid TTIs, highlighting the importance of interviewer experience, perspicacity, and face-to-face contact with donors for blood safety assurance.