Revista de saude publica · 2026
Intimate partner violence and associated factors among adult women: a population-based study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Simon Camila, Costa Juvenal Soares Dias da, Olinto Maria Teresa Anselmo, Bairros Fernanda Souza de, Gonçalves Tonantzin Ribeiro
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The study investigated the lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence among women aged 20 to 69 years residing in the urban area of São Leopoldo (RS) and associated factors.
METHODS: This was a population-based cross-sectional study in which 1,113 women were interviewed. The outcome was self-reported lifetime intimate partner violence, and sociodemographic, physical and mental health, and behavioral variables were assessed. A stratified analysis by age group was performed.
RESULTS: The prevalence of intimate partner violence in the sample was 17.9% (95%CI 15.6-20.1). In the adjusted analysis, the outcome was associated with lower socioeconomic status, a history of sexually transmitted infections, and the presence of common mental disorders. In the stratified analysis, women aged 20-39 years had a 13.7% (95%CI 10.5-16.8) lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence, with nearly three times the likelihood among those with common mental disorders. Among women aged 40 years or older, the prevalence was 20.7% (95%CI 17.6-23.8), with those in the lowest socioeconomic class, who were single, divorced, or widowed, who self-reported sexually transmitted infections, and who had common mental disorders being more likely to experience the outcome. Secondary intersectional analyses revealed a higher prevalence of intimate partner violence among Black or Brown women with low educational attainment (PR = 1.67; 95%CI 1.14-2.45) and White women with low educational attainment (PR = 1.58; 95%CI 1.14-2.19), compared to white women with higher educational attainment.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated a high lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence, reinforcing the need for public policies that improve women's socioeconomic conditions, as well as integrated gender-based violence prevention programs that incorporate mental health care in the support provided to victims.
METHODS: This was a population-based cross-sectional study in which 1,113 women were interviewed. The outcome was self-reported lifetime intimate partner violence, and sociodemographic, physical and mental health, and behavioral variables were assessed. A stratified analysis by age group was performed.
RESULTS: The prevalence of intimate partner violence in the sample was 17.9% (95%CI 15.6-20.1). In the adjusted analysis, the outcome was associated with lower socioeconomic status, a history of sexually transmitted infections, and the presence of common mental disorders. In the stratified analysis, women aged 20-39 years had a 13.7% (95%CI 10.5-16.8) lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence, with nearly three times the likelihood among those with common mental disorders. Among women aged 40 years or older, the prevalence was 20.7% (95%CI 17.6-23.8), with those in the lowest socioeconomic class, who were single, divorced, or widowed, who self-reported sexually transmitted infections, and who had common mental disorders being more likely to experience the outcome. Secondary intersectional analyses revealed a higher prevalence of intimate partner violence among Black or Brown women with low educational attainment (PR = 1.67; 95%CI 1.14-2.45) and White women with low educational attainment (PR = 1.58; 95%CI 1.14-2.19), compared to white women with higher educational attainment.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated a high lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence, reinforcing the need for public policies that improve women's socioeconomic conditions, as well as integrated gender-based violence prevention programs that incorporate mental health care in the support provided to victims.